Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34660615›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2021

Plethysmographic Peripheral Perfusion Index: Could It Be a New Vital Sign?

Mamdouh M Elshal, Ahmed M Hasanin, Maha Mostafa, Reham M Gamal

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06535581 (Perfusion Index in the Follow-up of Postoperative Pain; Hypertension Patient Sample), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06535581 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Perfusion Index in the Follow-up of Postoperative Pain; Hypertension Patient Sample

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorAmasya UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled100ConditionsPerfusion, ComplicationsArmssurgery patient
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mamdouh M ElshalDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Ahmed M HasaninDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Maha MostafaDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Reham M GamalDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The plethysmographic peripheral perfusion index (PPI) is a very useful parameter with various emerging utilities in medical practice. The PPI represents the ratio between pulsatile and non-pulsatile portions in peripheral circulation and is mainly affected by two main determinants: cardiac output and balance between sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous systems. The PPI decreases in cases of sympathetic predominance and/or low cardiac output states; therefore, it is a useful predictor of patient outcomes in critical care units. The PPI could be a surrogate for cardiac output in tests for fluid responsiveness, as an objective measure of pain especially in un-cooperative patients, and as a predictor of successful weaning from mechanical ventilation. The PPI is simple to measure, easy to interpret, and has continuously displayed variables, making it a convenient parameter for detecting the adequacy of blood flow and sympathetic-parasympathetic balance.

Indexed as

anesthesiacritically illperipheral perfusion indexplethysmographyshock

Identifiers

PMID34660615
PMCPMC8517109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.