ArticleFrontiers in oncology2021
Application of Deep Convolution Network to Automated Image Segmentation of Chest CT for Patients With Tumor.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Landscape of 2D Deep Learning Segmentation Networks Applied to CT Scan from Lung Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- A multi-class deep learning model for early lung cancer and chronic kidney disease detection using computed tomography images.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo automate image delineation of tissues and organs in oncological radiotherapy by combining the deep learning methods of fully convolutional network (FCN) and atrous convolution (AC).
methodsA total of 120 sets of chest CT images of patients were selected, on which radiologists had outlined the structures of normal organs. Of these 120 sets of images, 70 sets (8,512 axial slice images) were used as the training set, 30 sets (5,525 axial slice images) as the validation set, and 20 sets (3,602 axial slice images) as the test set. We selected 5 published FCN models and 1 published Unet model, and then combined FCN with AC algorithms to generate 3 improved deep convolutional networks, namely, dilation fully convolutional networks (D-FCN). The images in the training set were used to fine-tune and train the above 8 networks, respectively. The images in the validation set were used to validate the 8 networks in terms of the automated identification and delineation of organs, in order to obtain the optimal segmentation model of each network. Finally, the images of the test set were used to test the optimal segmentation models, and thus we evaluated the capability of each model of image segmentation by comparing their Dice coefficients between automated and physician delineation.
resultsAfter being fully tuned and trained with the images in the training set, all the networks in this study performed well in automated image segmentation. Among them, the improved D-FCN 4s network model yielded the best performance in automated segmentation in the testing experiment, with an global Dice of 87.11%, and a Dice of 87.11%, 97.22%, 97.16%, 89.92%, and 70.51% for left lung, right lung, pericardium, trachea, and esophagus, respectively.
conclusionWe proposed an improved D-FCN. Our results showed that this network model might effectively improve the accuracy of automated segmentation of the images in thoracic radiotherapy, and simultaneously perform automated segmentation of multiple targets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.