Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34660269›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2021

Biliary Strictures and Cholangiocarcinoma - Untangling a Diagnostic Conundrum.

Alexander Ney, Andres Garcia-Sampedro, George Goodchild, Pilar Acedo, Giuseppe Fusai, Stephen P Pereira

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander NeyInstitute for Liver and Digestive Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Andres Garcia-SampedroInstitute for Liver and Digestive Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
George GoodchildSt. Bartholomew's hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Pilar AcedoInstitute for Liver and Digestive Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Giuseppe FusaiDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science - University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Stephen P PereiraInstitute for Liver and Digestive Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
University College London · GBBarts Health NHS Trust · GB

Funding

Pancreatic Cancer UK RG2014_01_PERERIA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cholangiocarcinoma is an uncommon and highly aggressive biliary tract malignancy with few manifestations until late disease stages. Diagnosis is currently achieved through a combination of clinical, biochemical, radiological and histological techniques. A number of reported cancer biomarkers have the potential to be incorporated into diagnostic pathways, but all lack sufficient sensitivity and specificity limiting their possible use in screening and early diagnosis. The limitations of standard serum markers such as CA19-9, CA125 and CEA have driven researchers to identify multiple novel biomarkers, yet their clinical translation has been slow with a general requirement for further validation in larger patient cohorts. We review recent advances in the diagnostic pathway for suspected CCA as well as emerging diagnostic biomarkers for early detection, with a particular focus on non-invasive approaches.

Indexed as

biliary stricturesbiomarkerscholangiocarcinomaearly detectionERCP (Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography)primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC)

Identifiers

PMID34660269
PMCPMC8515053
OpenAlexW3203278501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.