Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34660175›Full record

ReviewZeitschrift fur Gesundheitswissenschaften = Journal of public health2021

The impact of fake news on social media and its influence on health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.

Yasmim Mendes Rocha, Gabriel Acácio de Moura, Gabriel Alves Desidério, Carlos Henrique de Oliveira, Francisco Dantas Lourenço, Larissa Deadame de Figueiredo Nicolete

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Zeitschrift fur Gesundheitswissenschaften = Journal of public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 119 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
119citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

119 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Infodemics and health misinformation: a systematic review of reviews.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2022
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yasmim Mendes RochaPost-graduate Program in Pharmaceutical Sciences, Federal University of Ceará (UFC), Campus Porangabussu, Fortaleza, CE 60.430-370 Brazil.
Gabriel Acácio de MouraPost-graduate Program in Veterinary Sciences, State University of Ceará (UECE), Campus do Itaperi, Fortaleza, CE 60.714-903 Brazil.
Gabriel Alves DesidérioHealth Sciences Institute, University of International Integration of the Afro-Brazilian Lusophony Brazil, CE 060 - Km51, Redençao, CE 62785-000 Brazil.
Carlos Henrique de OliveiraHealth Sciences Institute, University of International Integration of the Afro-Brazilian Lusophony Brazil, CE 060 - Km51, Redençao, CE 62785-000 Brazil.
Francisco Dantas LourençoHealth Sciences Institute, University of International Integration of the Afro-Brazilian Lusophony Brazil, CE 060 - Km51, Redençao, CE 62785-000 Brazil.
Larissa Deadame de Figueiredo NicoleteHealth Sciences Institute, University of International Integration of the Afro-Brazilian Lusophony Brazil, CE 060 - Km51, Redençao, CE 62785-000 Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4248-6462

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAs the new coronavirus disease propagated around the world, the rapid spread of news caused uncertainty in the population. False news has taken over social media, becoming part of life for many people. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate, through a systematic review, the impact of social media on the dissemination of infodemic knowing and its impacts on health.

methodsA systematic search was performed in the MedLine, Virtual Health Library (VHL), and Scielo databases from January 1, 2020, to May 11, 2021. Studies that addressed the impact of fake news on patients and healthcare professionals around the world were included. It was possible to methodologically assess the quality of the selected studies using the Loney and Newcastle-Ottawa Scales.

resultsFourteen studies were eligible for inclusion, consisting of six cross-sectional and eight descriptive observational studies. Through questionnaires, five studies included measures of anxiety or psychological distress caused by misinformation; another seven assessed feeling fear, uncertainty, and panic, in addition to attacks on health professionals and people of Asian origin.

conclusionBy analyzing the phenomenon of fake news in health, it was possible to observe that infodemic knowledge can cause psychological disorders and panic, fear, depression, and fatigue.

Indexed as

Covid-19Fake newsHealthInfodemic knowing

Identifiers

PMID34660175
PMCPMC8502082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.