Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34660166›Full record

ReviewHealth and technology2021

Current limitations to identify covid-19 using artificial intelligence with chest x-ray imaging (part ii). The shortcut learning problem.

José Daniel López-Cabrera, Rubén Orozco-Morales, Jorge Armando Portal-Díaz, Orlando Lovelle-Enríquez, Marlén Pérez-Díaz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Health and technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

José Daniel López-CabreraCentro de Investigaciones de La Informática, Facultad de Matemática, Física y Computación, Universidad Central "Marta Abreu" de Las Villas, Villa Clara, Santa Clara, Cuba.ORCID 0000-0003-2137-0361
Rubén Orozco-MoralesDepartamento de Control Automático, Facultad de Ingeniería Eléctrica, Universidad Central "Marta Abreu" de Las Villas, Villa Clara, Santa Clara, Cuba.ORCID 0000-0002-6240-1569
Jorge Armando Portal-DíazDepartamento de Control Automático, Facultad de Ingeniería Eléctrica, Universidad Central "Marta Abreu" de Las Villas, Villa Clara, Santa Clara, Cuba.ORCID 0000-0003-1360-4930
Orlando Lovelle-EnríquezDepartamento de Imagenología, Hospital Comandante Manuel Fajardo Rivero, Villa Clara, Santa Clara, Cuba.ORCID 0000-0003-3944-3514
Marlén Pérez-DíazDepartamento de Control Automático, Facultad de Ingeniería Eléctrica, Universidad Central "Marta Abreu" de Las Villas, Villa Clara, Santa Clara, Cuba.ORCID 0000-0002-3706-9154

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic, computer vision researchers have been working on automatic identification of this disease using radiological images. The results achieved by automatic classification methods far exceed those of human specialists, with sensitivity as high as 100% being reported. However, prestigious radiology societies have stated that the use of this type of imaging alone is not recommended as a diagnostic method. According to some experts the patterns presented in these images are unspecific and subtle, overlapping with other viral pneumonias. This report seeks to evaluate the analysis the robustness and generalizability of different approaches using artificial intelligence, deep learning and computer vision to identify COVID-19 using chest X-rays images. We also seek to alert researchers and reviewers to the issue of "shortcut learning". Recommendations are presented to identify whether COVID-19 automatic classification models are being affected by shortcut learning. Firstly, papers using explainable artificial intelligence methods are reviewed. The results of applying external validation sets are evaluated to determine the generalizability of these methods. Finally, studies that apply traditional computer vision methods to perform the same task are considered. It is evident that using the whole chest X-Ray image or the bounding box of the lungs, the image regions that contribute most to the classification appear outside of the lung region, something that is not likely possible. In addition, although the investigations that evaluated their models on data sets external to the training set, the effectiveness of these models decreased significantly, it may provide a more realistic representation as how the model will perform in the clinic. The results indicate that, so far, the existing models often involve shortcut learning, which makes their use less appropriate in the clinical setting.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceChest X-RaysCOVID-19Deep Learning

Identifiers

PMID34660166
PMCPMC8502237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.