ArticleCureus2021
A Potentially Dangerous Industrial Projectile Lodged in the Leg of a Steel Factory Worker.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Laparoscopic removal of a metallic foreign body embedded in the abdominal wall.Journal of surgical case reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Penetrating injuries due to fragments energized by an explosive event are life/limb-threatening and are associated with poor clinical and functional outcomes. Penetrating injuries are commonly inflicted in attacks with explosive devices. The extremities, especially the leg, are the most commonly affected body areas, presenting a high risk of infection, slow recovery, and the threat of amputation. This report presents a case of a young factory worker who sustained an injury to the leg with a foreign body lodged near the neuro-vascular bundle. A 44-year-old gentleman sustained a projectile injury while working in a stainless steel factory from the rula (steel rolling) machine with a foreign body getting lodged in the leg in March 2019. He was initially managed with wound care and didn't report any functional impairment. Gradually patient developed numbness and claudication symptoms of the foot over the next couple of years. He was subsequently operated on in 2021 for removal of the stainless steel foreign body encased in dystrophic calcification close to the tibial nerve and posterior tibial vessels. Interestingly the entry point of the foreign body was on the anterolateral aspect of the leg. The foreign body was removed using the postero-lateral approach to the tibia with careful dissection close to the neurovascular bundle. At a follow-up of 3 months, the patient is symptom-free with significant improvement of limb function. The authors propose that the foreign body crossed the interosseous membrane to get lodged close to the posterior tibial neurovascular bundle. In such a scenario, the patient was extremely lucky to have survived an amputation or significant functional injury of the limb. Proper protective equipment is needed not only for the torso but also for extremities to protect industrial workers from such limb-threatening injuries. Moreover, primary care physicians should be sensitised for the proper management of such injuries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.