ArticleCureus2021
Lymph Node Involvement in Oesophageal Carcinoma: A Single-Centre Observational Study From Western India.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Lymph node involvement is the most important predictor of prognosis in oesophageal cancer. The present study describes our single-centre experience of lymphadenopathy in oesophageal carcinoma cases at a tertiary care centre in the Marathwada region of Maharashtra state in western India. Methods This descriptive study included 31 patients who were operated for oesophageal carcinoma at the State Cancer Hospital in Marathwada from August 2015 to September 2017. Thirty patients underwent three-field lymph node dissections, and one patient underwent Ivor Lewis surgery with two-field lymph node dissections. Three-field lymph node dissections were through a thoracotomy, followed by laparotomy and left cervical incision. The lymphatic metastases were categorised as (a) adjacent node metastases, (b) multiple levels of lymph node metastases, and (c) skip node metastases. The histopathological assessment of the removed specimen and lymph nodes was done. Pathologists evaluated the character and depth of the primary tumour and its invasion and node involvement. The location and numbers of positive and negative nodes were recorded. Results A total of 31 patients were included in the study, of which 17 had lymph node involvement. A total of 946 lymph nodes were dissected and examined, and the average number of lymph nodes removed per patient was 30.51. Among the 28 squamous cell carcinoma cases, lymph node involvement was found in 14 cases (50%) whereas, in adenocarcinoma, all the three cases showed lymph node involvement. In 11 cases of squamous cell carcinoma, thoracic lymph nodes were involved, whereas abdominal lymph nodes were involved in nine and cervical lymph nodes in two cases. Thoracic lymph nodes were involved in two cases of adenocarcinoma and abdominal lymph nodes were involved in one case of adenocarcinoma. Conclusions Squamous cell carcinoma was the predominant type, and lymph node metastasis was observed in 50% of these cases. Thoracic lymph nodes were more commonly involved. Tumour staging T2 and T3 had an increasing percentage of lymph nodes involved. Lymph node involvement was more in moderately differentiated and undifferentiated oesophageal cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.