ArticleAmerican journal of cancer research2021
Suppression of breast cancer cells resistant to a pure anti-estrogen with CAR-transduced natural killer cells.
Article in American journal of cancer research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Breast cancer immunotherapy: mechanisms of immune evasion, biomarkers, and emerging therapeutic strategies.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Precision sniper for solid tumors: CAR-NK cell therapy.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2025Review
- Current status and innovative developments of CAR-T-cell therapy for the treatment of breast cancer.Cancer cell international · 2025Review
- CAR-based immunotherapy for breast cancer: peculiarities, ongoing investigations, and future strategies.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Engineered Adoptive T-Cell Therapies for Breast Cancer: Current Progress, Challenges, and Potential.Cancers · 2023Review
- Chimeric antigen receptor engineered natural killer cells for cancer therapy.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2023Review
- A Hot Topic: Cancer Immunotherapy and Natural Killer Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Preclinical and clinical studies of CAR-NK-cell therapies for malignancies.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anti-estrogens as hormone therapy are the mainstay treatment for estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. ER inhibitors through modulating the transcriptional function of ER have been the frontline anti-estrogens to which refractory phenotype often developed in advanced cancer. The anti-estrogen fulvestrant is currently the only clinically approved pure anti-estrogen which causes ER degradation. However, resistance to fulvestrant still occurs and unfortunately it leaves few choices other than chemotherapy as the later-line treatments to fulvestrant-resistant tumors. Here we show that fulvestrant resistance was accompanied by increased expression of a number of innate immune response genes including the natural killer (NK) cell ligand B7-H6 on the cell surface. In an attempt to overcome the drug resistance phenotype, a NK-based molecular approach taking advantage of a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) system targeting B7-H6 was established and tested in cells with acquired resistance to fulvestrant. The results demonstrate that the cell therapy approach as a single agent can effectively induce cell death of the resistant cancer cells which is enhanced by the increased expression of cell surface B7-H6. This approach departs from the traditional strategies of conquering anti-estrogen resistant breast cancer and offers a new avenue to eradicate hormone-refractory malignant solid tumors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34659898PMC8493389W3206378563What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.