Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34659808›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2021

Second and later-line erlotinib use in non-small cell lung cancer: real world outcomes and practice patterns overtime in Canada.

Kirstin Perdrizet, Rinku Sutradhar, Qing Li, Ning Liu, Craig C Earle, Natasha B Leighl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kirstin PerdrizetDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Rinku SutradharInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Qing LiICES (formerly the Institute for Clinical and Evaluates Sciences), Toronto, Canada.
Ning LiuICES (formerly the Institute for Clinical and Evaluates Sciences), Toronto, Canada.
Craig C EarleDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Natasha B LeighlDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Canada, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor therapies in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were initially approved regardless of

methodsThis is a retrospective cohort study derived at ICES (formerly known as the Institute for Clinical and Evaluative Sciences) of advanced NSCLC patients diagnosed from 2007-2016 in Ontario, Canada, over the age of 65, who received at least one dose of first-line chemotherapy. The exposure of interest was receipt of second or later-line erlotinib. The primary outcome was the hazard ratio for mortality evaluated using a Cox proportional hazards model, and the secondary outcome, ED visits, was evaluated using a Poisson model.

resultsFirst-line chemotherapy was administered in 30.4% of stage IV NSCLC patients. Of these patients, 19.7% received second or later-line erlotinib. The proportion of patients prescribed second or later-line erlotinib decreased over the course of the study (P<0.0001). Unadjusted median overall survival in the entire cohort was 325 days (95% CI: 314-337 days), 513 days (95% CI: 485-539 days) in the erlotinib cohort, and 282 days (95% CI: 270-291 days) in the non-erlotinib cohort. Despite this, the adjusted hazard ratio for death was 1.89 (95% CI: 1.73-2.07, P<0.0001) for patients on erlotinib. Patients receiving erlotinib also had a marginally higher relative rates of ED visits with an adjusted relative risk of 1.10 (95% CI: 1.02-1.19, P=0.013).

conclusionsThis study highlights the importance of using EGFR targeted treatments in NSCLC patients with a predictive biomarker, and suggests that treatment with erlotinib therapy is unlikely to benefit unselected patients with advanced NSCLC.

Indexed as

biomarkerserlotinibLung cancerreal-world data

Identifiers

PMID34659808
PMCPMC8482335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.