ReviewNeuroscience of consciousness2021
A relational approach to consciousness: categories of level and contents of consciousness.
Review in Neuroscience of consciousness, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.
- Principal bundle geometry of qualia: Understanding the quality of consciousness from symmetry.PNAS nexus · 2026Article
- Consciousness in the Brain: An Integrative Review of Contemporary Theories.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- A dynamic stimulus distribution methodology for efficient large-scale pairwise relational data collection.MethodsX · 2026Article
- Towards a Mathematical Structure of Global Phenomenal Consciousness.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- We need to explain subjective experience, but its explanation may not be mechanistic.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2026Article
- Cortical representational geometry of diverse tasks reveals subject-specific and subject-invariant cognitive structures.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Consciousness or pseudo-consciousness? A clash of two paradigms.Nature neuroscience · 2025Article
- Is my "red" your "red"?: Evaluating structural correspondences between color similarity judgments using unsupervised alignment.iScience · 2025Article
- Comparing color qualia structures through a similarity task in young children versus adults.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- A neuroimaging dataset during sequential color qualia similarity judgments with and without reports.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Qualia structures collapse for geometric shapes, but not faces, when spatial attention is withdrawn.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2025Article
- Quantum-like Qualia hypothesis: from quantum cognition to quantum perception.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- When philosophical nuance matters: safeguarding consciousness research from restrictive assumptions.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Exploring the role of structuralist methodology in the neuroscience of consciousness: a defense and analysis.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2023Article
- What is category theory to cognitive science? Compositional representation and comparison.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Review
- An adjunction hypothesis between qualia and reports.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Review
- Neurophenomenal structuralism. A philosophical agenda for a structuralist neuroscience of consciousness.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2022Article
- A Compositional Model of Consciousness Based on Consciousness-Only.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Growing evidence for separate neural mechanisms for attention and consciousness.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2021Review
- Explanatory profiles of models of consciousness - towards a systematic classification.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Characterizing consciousness in and of itself is notoriously difficult. Here, we propose an alternative approach to characterize, and eventually define, consciousness through exhaustive descriptions of consciousness' relationships to all other consciousness. This approach is founded in category theory. Indeed, category theory can prove that two objects A and B in a category can be equivalent if and only if all the relationships that A holds with others in the category are the same as those of B; this proof is called the Yoneda lemma. To introduce the Yoneda lemma, we gradually introduce key concepts of category theory to consciousness researchers. Along the way, we propose several possible definitions of categories of consciousness, both in terms of level and contents, through the usage of simple examples. We propose to use the categorical structure of consciousness as a gold standard to formalize empirical research (e.g. color qualia structure at fovea and periphery) and, especially, the empirical testing of theories of consciousness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.