Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34659782›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2021

Animal contests and microplastics: evidence of disrupted behaviour in hermit crabs

Eoghan M Cunningham, Amy Mundye, Louise Kregting, Jaimie T A Dick, Andrew Crump, Gillian Riddell, Gareth Arnott

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Short-Term Microplastic Exposure Impairs Cognition in Hermit Crabs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  4. Progress on the Effects of Microplastics on Aquatic Crustaceans: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eoghan M CunninghamQueen's University Marine Laboratory, Queen's University Belfast, 12-13 The Strand, Portaferry BT22 1PF, Northern Ireland, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6323-079X
Amy MundyeInstitute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University, Belfast BT9 5DL, Northern Ireland, UK.
Louise KregtingQueen's University Marine Laboratory, Queen's University Belfast, 12-13 The Strand, Portaferry BT22 1PF, Northern Ireland, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7217-0146
Jaimie T A DickQueen's University Marine Laboratory, Queen's University Belfast, 12-13 The Strand, Portaferry BT22 1PF, Northern Ireland, UK.
Andrew CrumpInstitute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University, Belfast BT9 5DL, Northern Ireland, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4485-5740
Gillian RiddellInstitute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University, Belfast BT9 5DL, Northern Ireland, UK.
Gareth ArnottInstitute for Global Food Security, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University, Belfast BT9 5DL, Northern Ireland, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1525-3708
Queen's University Belfast · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microplastics are ubiquitous in global marine systems and may have negative impacts on a vast range of species. Recently, microplastics were shown to impair shell selection assessments in hermit crabs, an essential behaviour for their survival. Hermit crabs also engage in 'rapping' contests over shells, based on cognitive assessments of shell quality and opponent fighting ability and, hence, are a useful model species for examining the effects of microplastics on fitness-relevant behaviour in marine systems. Here, we investigated how a 5-day microplastic exposure (25 microplastics/litre) affected the dynamics and outcome of 120 staged hermit crab contests. Using a 2 × 2 factorial design, we examined how microplastics (i.e. presence or absence) and contestant role (i.e. attacker or defender) affected various behavioural variables. Significantly higher raps per bout were needed to evict microplastic-treated defenders when attackers were pre-exposed to control conditions (i.e. no plastic). Also, significantly longer durations of rapping bouts were needed to evict control-treated defenders when attackers were pre-exposed to microplastics. We suggest that microplastics impaired defenders' ability to identify resource holding potential and also affected attackers' rapping strength and intensity during contests. These impacts on animal contests indicate that microplastics have broader deleterious effects on marine biota than currently recognized.

Indexed as

animal behaviourcognitioncontestcrustaceanpollutantssynthetic polymers

Identifiers

PMID34659782
PMCPMC8511743
OpenAlexW3206490826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.