ArticleRoyal Society open science2021
Preregistration in diverse contexts: a preregistration template for the application of cognitive models.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- People are at least as good at optimizing reward rate under equivalent fixed-trial compared to fixed-time conditions.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2025Article
- Uncovering the cognitive mechanisms underlying the gaze cueing effect.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2024Article
- Using preregistration as a tool for transparent fNIRS study design.Neurophotonics · 2023Article
- Expert agreement in prior elicitation and its effects on Bayesian inference.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2022Review
- Article
- Neurocomputational models of altruistic decision-making and social motives: Advances, pitfalls, and future directions.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science · 2021Review
- Preregistration in diverse contexts: a preregistration template for the application of cognitive models.Royal Society open science · 2021Article
- Ensuring the quality and specificity of preregistrations.PLoS biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, open science practices have become increasingly popular in psychology and related sciences. These practices aim to increase rigour and transparency in science as a potential response to the challenges posed by the replication crisis. Many of these reforms-including the increasingly used
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.