Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34659775›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2021

Using genetic algorithms to uncover individual differences in how humans represent facial emotion.

Christina O Carlisi, Kyle Reed, Fleur G L Helmink, Robert Lachlan, Darren P Cosker, Essi Viding, Isabelle Mareschal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Internal representations of facial emotions in schizophrenia.Schizophrenia research. Cognition · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Genetic algorithms reveal profound individual differences in emotion recognition.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  6. Emotion recognition bias depends on stimulus morphing strategy.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Christina O CarlisiDivision of Psychology and Language Sciences, Developmental Risk and Resilience Unit, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AP, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0942-8586
Kyle ReedDepartment of Computer Science, University of Bath, 1 West, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, UK.
Fleur G L HelminkErasmus University Medical Center, s-Gravendijkwal 230, Rotterdam 3015 CE, The Netherlands.
Robert LachlanDepartment of Psychology, Royal Holloway University of London, Wolfson Building, Egham TW20 0EX, UK.
Darren P CoskerDepartment of Computer Science, University of Bath, 1 West, Claverton Down, Bath BA2 7AY, UK.
Essi VidingDivision of Psychology and Language Sciences, Developmental Risk and Resilience Unit, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AP, UK.
Isabelle MareschalSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Department of Psychology, Queen Mary University of London, G. E. Fogg Building, Mile End Road, London E1 4DQ, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S011307/1Wellcome Trust 206459/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emotional facial expressions critically impact social interactions and cognition. However, emotion research to date has generally relied on the assumption that people represent categorical emotions in the same way, using standardized stimulus sets and overlooking important individual differences. To resolve this problem, we developed and tested a task using

Indexed as

affective processingfacial emotiongenetic algorithmindividual differences

Identifiers

PMID34659775
PMCPMC8511778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.