Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34659646›Full record

ArticleOnline journal of public health informatics2021

Visual Analytics of Tuberculosis Detection Rat Performance.

Joan Jonathan, Camilius Sanga, Magesa Mwita, Georgies Mgode

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Online journal of public health informatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joan JonathanCentre for Information and Communication Technology, Sokoine University of Agriculture, P.O Box 3218, Chuo Kikuu, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Camilius SangaSokoine National Agricultural Library (SNAL), Sokoine University of Agriculture, P.O.Box 3022, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Magesa MwitaCentre for Information and Communication Technology, Sokoine University of Agriculture, P.O Box 3218, Chuo Kikuu, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Georgies MgodePest Management Centre, Sokoine University of Agriculture, P.O Box 3110, Chuo Kikuu, Morogoro, Tanzania.
Sokoine University of Agriculture · TZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) disease remains a global challenge, and the need for innovative diagnostic approaches is inevitable. Trained African giant pouched rats are the scent TB detection technology for operational research. The adoption of this technology is beneficial to countries with a high TB burden due to its cost-effectiveness and speed than microscopy. However, rats with some factors perform better. Thus, more insights on factors that may affect performance is important to increase rats' TB detection performance. This paper intends to provide understanding on the factors that influence rats TB detection performance using visual analytics approach. Visual analytics provide insight of data through the combination of computational predictive models and interactive visualizations. Three algorithms such as Decision tree, Random Forest and Naive Bayes were used to predict the factors that influence rats TB detection performance. Hence, our study found that age is the most significant factor, and rats of ages between 3.1 to 6 years portrayed potentiality. The algorithms were validated using the same test data to check their prediction accuracy. The accuracy check showed that the random forest outperforms with an accuracy of 78.82% than the two. However, their accuracies difference is small. The study findings may help rats TB trainers, researchers in rats TB and Information systems, and decision makers to improve detection performance. This study recommends further research that incorporates gender factors and a large sample size.

Indexed as

African giant pouched ratsClassification Technique in Tuberculosis diagnosisData mining in healthcare

Identifiers

PMID34659646
PMCPMC8500793
OpenAlexW3201357393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.