ArticleFrontiers in psychology2021
Don't Call It Smart: Working From Home During the Pandemic Crisis.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Remote workers' life quality and stress during COVID-19: a systematic review.European journal of public health · 2025Pooled it
- COVID-19 and stroke in women: impact on clinical, psychosocial and research aspects.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024Review
- Working from home during COVID-19: boundary management tactics and energy resources management strategies reported by public service employees in a qualitative study.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Working from home and mental well-being at different stages of the COVID-19 pandemic.PloS one · 2024Article
- Effects of working from home on lifestyle behaviors and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: A survey study.PloS one · 2024Article
- Impact of COVID-19 on Mothers Raising Children with Special Needs: Insights from a Survey Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Anxiety-associated factors among employees with different personality profiles: a cross-sectional study in China.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Do I want to work from home today? Specific job crafting strategies of public service employees working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany: a qualitative study.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- The Role of Self-Efficacy, Work-Related Autonomy and Work-Family Conflict on Employee's Stress Level during Home-Based Remote Work in Germany.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Working from home, work-time control and mental health: Results from the Brazilian longitudinal study of adult health (ELSA-Brasil).Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- "Why couldn't we do this more often?": exploring the feasibility of virtual and distributed work in product design engineering.Research in engineering design · 2022Article
- Smart Working and Well-Being before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2021Article
- Relationship between mental fatigue and burnout syndrome in remote workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: an integrative review.Revista brasileira de medicina do trabalho : publicacao oficial da Associacao Nacional de Medicina do Trabalho-ANAMTReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The recent COVID-19 pandemic and related social distancing measures have significantly changed worldwide employment conditions. In developed economies, institutions and organizations, both public and private, are called upon to reflect on new organizational models of work and human resource management, which - in fact - should offer workers sufficient flexibility in adapting their work schedules remotely to their personal (and family) needs. This study aims to explore, within a Job Demands-Resources framework, whether and to what extent job demands (workload and social isolation), organizational job resources (perceived organizational support), and personal resources (self-efficacy, vision about the future and commitment to organizational change) have affected workers' quality of life during the pandemic, taking into account the potential mediating role of job satisfaction and perceived stress. Using data from a sample of 293 workers, we estimate measurement and structural models, according to the Item Response Theory and the Path analysis frameworks, which allow us to operationalize the latent traits and study the complex structure of relationships between the latent dimensions. We inserted in the model as control variables, the socio-economic and demographic characteristics of the respondents, with particular emphasis on gender differences and the presence and age of children. The study offers insights into the relationship between remote work and quality of life, and the need to rethink human resource management policies considering the opportunities and critical issues highlighted by working full-time remotely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.