Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34659058›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2021

Lower Internal Additive Noise and Better Perceptual Template Characterize Binocular Contrast Sensitivity Summation.

Pan Zhang, Hanlin Wang, Weicong Ren, Qing Lu, Chenxi Li, Ge Chen, Shilei Zhang, Jiayu Tao, Ying Li, Di Wu and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Pan ZhangDepartment of Psychology, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Hanlin WangDepartment of Psychology, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Weicong RenDepartment of Psychology, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Qing LuLibrary, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Chenxi LiSchool of Nursing, Yueyang Vocational Technical College, Yueyang, China.
Ge ChenCollege of Art and Design, Zhengzhou University of Light Industry, Zhengzhou, China.
Shilei ZhangHuihua College, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Jiayu TaoDepartment of Psychology, Chengde Medical University, Chengde, China.
Ying LiDepartment of Psychiatry, Beijing Children's Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children Healthy, Beijing, China.
Di WuMilitary Medical Psychology School, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Zeng WangDepartment of Psychology, Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Binocular summation is generally defined as the superiority of binocular over monocular performance. Here, we investigated how external noise modulates the effect of binocular summation on the contrast sensitivity function (CSF) and clarified the corresponding mechanisms with a perceptual template model (PTM). The contrast sensitivity (CS) over 10 spatial frequencies and three external noise levels was assessed under one binocular and two monocular viewing conditions. The binocular summation ratio (BSR) was calculated by dividing the area under the log CSF (AULCSF), or the CS of using both eyes, by that of only using the "good eye" (BSRG) or the "bad eye" (BSRB), respectively. We found that: (1) based on the AULCSF, the BSRB was higher than the BSRG; (2) based on the AULCSF, the BSR was more pronounced under zero-noise than under low-noise conditions, but the BSR was not higher than 1 under high-noise conditions due to a large individual difference; (3) based on the CS, with increasing spatial frequencies, the BSRB steadily increased; (4) both decreased internal additive noise and an improved perceptual template accounted for the gain in binocular summation. These results help us better understand the features of binocular CS and shed light on the clinical studies on populations with monocular CS loss.

Indexed as

binocular summationcontrast sensitivityinternal additive noiseperceptual templatespatial frequency

Identifiers

PMID34659058
PMCPMC8514620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.