Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34659024›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2021

Development and Initial Validation of the Duke Misophonia Questionnaire.

M Zachary Rosenthal, Deepika Anand, Clair Cassiello-Robbins, Zachary J Williams, Rachel E Guetta, Jacqueline Trumbull, Lisalynn D Kelley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Misophonia: A Systematic Review of Current and Future Trends in This Emerging Clinical Field.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

M Zachary RosenthalDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.
Deepika AnandDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.
Clair Cassiello-RobbinsDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.
Zachary J WilliamsMedical Scientist Training Program, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, United States.
Rachel E GuettaDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Jacqueline TrumbullDepartment of Psychology & Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Lisalynn D KelleyDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States.

Funding

MEDICAL SCIENTIST TRAINING PROGRAMT32GM007347 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAMS, CHRISTOPHER S. · 1985 to 2023
$26.3M
Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM152284 · NIGMS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI Christopher S. Williams · 2024 to 2026
$4.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007347NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM152284
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Misophonia is characterized by decreased tolerance and accompanying defensive motivational system responding to certain aversive sounds and contextual cues associated with such stimuli, typically repetitive oral (e. g., eating sounds) or nasal (e.g., breathing sounds) stimuli. Responses elicit significant psychological distress and impairment in functioning, and include acute increases in (a) negative affect (e.g., anger, anxiety, and disgust), (b) physiological arousal (e.g., sympathetic nervous system activation), and (c) overt behavior (e.g., escape behavior and verbal aggression toward individuals generating triggers). A major barrier to research and treatment of misophonia is the lack of rigorously validated assessment measures. As such, the primary purpose of this study was to develop and psychometrically validate a self-report measure of misophonia, the Duke Misophonia Questionnaire (DMQ). There were two phases of measure development. In Phase 1, items were generated and iteratively refined from a combination of the scientific literature and qualitative feedback from misophonia sufferers, their family members, and professional experts. In Phase 2, a large community sample of adults (

Indexed as

item response theorymeasure development (psychometrics)measure development/validationmisophoniaMisophonia Questionnaire

Identifiers

PMID34659024
PMCPMC8511674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.