ArticleFrontiers in psychology2021
Relationship Between Item and Source Memory: Explanation of Connection-Strength Model.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hemispheric imbalance in mild cognitive impairment: a graph-theoretical analysis of multimodal brain networks.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
- Dissociable effects of schema congruency on item recognition and source memory across levels of expectedness and surprise.Memory & cognition · 2026Article
- Who Do We Remember? Facial Anomalies, Race, and Sex in Social Categorization.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Common and distinct contributions of the dorsomedial prefrontal and posterior parietal cortices to social episodic memory.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2026Article
- Age-related decline in source and associative memory.Cognitive processing · 2025Review
- Disruption of white matter integrity and its relationship with cognitive function in non-severe traumatic brain injury.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Article
- Unraveling the brain mechanisms of source monitoring with non-invasive brain stimulation: A systematic review.International journal of clinical and health psychology : IJCHPArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The controversy in the relationship between item memory and source memory is a focus of episodic memory. Some studies show the trade-off between item memory and source memory, some show the consistency between them, and others show the independence between them. This review attempts to point out the connection-strength model, implying the different types and strengths of the important role of the item-source connections in the relationship between item memory and source memory, which is based on the same essence in the unified framework. The logic of the model is that when item memory and source memory share the same or relevant connection between item and source, they positively connect, or they are independently or negatively connected. This review integrates empirical evidence from the domains of cognition, cognitive neuroscience, and mathematical modeling to validate our hypothesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.