Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34658966›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2021

Examining Differences in Fear Learning in Patients With Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder With Pupillometry, Startle Electromyography and Skin Conductance Responses.

Dorothee Pöhlchen, Marthe Priouret, Miriam S Kraft, Florian P Binder, Deniz A Gürsel, Götz Berberich, BeCOME working group, Kathrin Koch, Victor I Spoormaker

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dorothee PöhlchenDepartment of Translational Research in Psychiatry, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany.
Marthe PriouretDepartment of Translational Research in Psychiatry, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany.
Miriam S KraftDepartment of Translational Research in Psychiatry, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany.
Florian P BinderDepartment of Translational Research in Psychiatry, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany.
Deniz A GürselDepartment of Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Götz BerberichWindach Institute and Hospital of Neurobehavioural Research and Therapy, Windach, Germany.
BeCOME working group
Kathrin KochDepartment of Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Victor I SpoormakerDepartment of Translational Research in Psychiatry, Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Munich, Germany.
Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry · DETUM Klinikum · DEFraunhofer Institute for Wind Energy Systems · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is characterized by recurrent, persistent thoughts and repetitive behaviors causing stress and anxiety. In the associative learning model of OCD, mechanisms of fear extinction are supposed to partly underlie symptom development, maintenance and treatment of OCD, proposing that OCD patients suffer from rigid memory associations and inhibitory learning deficits. To test these assumptions, previous studies have used skin conductance and subjective ratings as readouts in fear conditioning paradigms, finding impaired fear extinction learning, impaired fear extinction recall or no differences between individuals with OCD and healthy controls. Against this heterogeneous background, we tested fear acquisition and extinction in 37 OCD patients and 56 healthy controls, employing skin conductance as well as pupillometry and startle electromyography. Extinction recall was also included in a subsample. We did not observe differences between groups in any of the task phases, except a trend toward higher startle amplitudes during extinction for OCD. Overall, sensitive readouts such as pupillometry and startle responses did not provide evidence for moderate-to-large inhibitory learning deficits using classical fear conditioning, challenging the assumption of generically impaired extinction learning and memory in OCD.

Indexed as

anxietyextinctionfear conditioninginhibitory learningobsessive compulsive disorder

Identifiers

PMID34658966
PMCPMC8517251
OpenAlexW3206970209

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.