Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34658768›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2021

Auditory Tests for Characterizing Hearing Deficits in Listeners With Various Hearing Abilities: The BEAR Test Battery.

Raul Sanchez-Lopez, Silje Grini Nielsen, Mouhamad El-Haj-Ali, Federica Bianchi, Michal Fereczkowski, Oscar M Cañete, Mengfan Wu, Tobias Neher, Torsten Dau, Sébastien Santurette

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Raul Sanchez-LopezHearing Systems Section, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Silje Grini NielsenHearing Systems Section, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Mouhamad El-Haj-AliInstitute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Federica BianchiHearing Systems Section, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Michal FereczkowskiHearing Systems Section, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Oscar M CañeteHearing Systems Section, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Mengfan WuInstitute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Tobias NeherInstitute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Torsten DauHearing Systems Section, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Sébastien SanturetteHearing Systems Section, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark.
Technical University of Denmark · DKOdense University Hospital · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKOticon Medical (Denmark) · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Better hEAring Rehabilitation (BEAR) project aims to provide a new clinical profiling tool-a test battery-for hearing loss characterization. Although the loss of sensitivity can be efficiently measured using pure-tone audiometry, the assessment of supra-threshold hearing deficits remains a challenge. In contrast to the classical "attenuation-distortion" model, the proposed BEAR approach is based on the hypothesis that the hearing abilities of a given listener can be characterized along two dimensions, reflecting independent types of perceptual deficits (distortions). A data-driven approach provided evidence for the existence of different auditory profiles with different degrees of distortions. Ten tests were included in a test battery, based on their clinical feasibility, time efficiency, and related evidence from the literature. The tests were divided into six categories: audibility, speech perception, binaural processing abilities, loudness perception, spectro-temporal modulation sensitivity, and spectro-temporal resolution. Seventy-five listeners with symmetric, mild-to-severe sensorineural hearing loss were selected from a clinical population. The analysis of the results showed interrelations among outcomes related to high-frequency processing and outcome measures related to low-frequency processing abilities. The results showed the ability of the tests to reveal differences among individuals and their potential use in clinical settings.

Indexed as

audiologyauditory profilebinaural processinghearing lossloudnessspectro-temporal resolutionspeech perception

Identifiers

PMID34658768
PMCPMC8512168
OpenAlexW3203804049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.