Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34658765›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2021

Cortical Thickness Related to Compensatory Viewing Strategies in Patients With Macular Degeneration.

Tina Plank, Edith M A Benkowitsch, Anton L Beer, Sabine Brandl, Maka Malania, Sebastian M Frank, Herbert Jägle, Mark W Greenlee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Increased Attentive Use Is Linked to More Idiosyncratic Functional Connections.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Possible compensatory role of cerebellum in bipolar disorder. A cortical thickness study.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tina PlankInstitute of Experimental Psychology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Edith M A BenkowitschInstitute of Experimental Psychology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Anton L BeerInstitute of Experimental Psychology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Sabine BrandlDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Maka MalaniaInstitute of Experimental Psychology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Sebastian M FrankInstitute of Experimental Psychology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Herbert JägleDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Mark W GreenleeInstitute of Experimental Psychology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
University of Regensburg · DEUniversity Hospital Regensburg · DEBrown University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retinal diseases like age-related macular degeneration (AMD) or hereditary juvenile macular dystrophies (JMD) lead to a loss of central vision. Many patients compensate for this loss with a pseudo fovea in the intact peripheral retina, the so-called "preferred retinal locus" (PRL). How extensive eccentric viewing associated with central vision loss (CVL) affects brain structures responsible for visual perception and visually guided eye movements remains unknown. CVL results in a reduction of cortical gray matter in the "lesion projection zone" (LPZ) in early visual cortex, but the thickness of primary visual cortex appears to be largely preserved for eccentric-field representations. Here we explore how eccentric viewing strategies are related to cortical thickness (CT) measures in early visual cortex and in brain areas involved in the control of eye movements (frontal eye fields, FEF, supplementary eye fields, SEF, and premotor eye fields, PEF). We determined the projection zones (regions of interest, ROIs) of the PRL and of an equally peripheral area in the opposite hemifield (OppPRL) in early visual cortex (V1 and V2) in 32 patients with MD and 32 age-matched controls (19-84 years) by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Subsequently, we calculated the CT in these ROIs and compared it between PRL and OppPRL as well as between groups. Additionally, we examined the CT of FEF, SEF, and PEF and correlated it with behavioral measures like reading speed and eccentric fixation stability at the PRL. We found a significant difference between PRL and OppPRL projection zones in V1 with increased CT at the PRL, that was more pronounced in the patients, but also visible in the controls. Although the mean CT of the eye fields did not differ significantly between patients and controls, we found a trend to a positive correlation between CT in the right FEF and SEF and fixation stability in the whole patient group and between CT in the right PEF and reading speed in the JMD subgroup. The results indicate a possible association between the compensatory strategies used by patients with CVL and structural brain properties in early visual cortex and cortical eye fields.

Indexed as

central vision losscortical eye fieldscortical thickness (CT)macular degenerationmagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)visual cortex

Identifiers

PMID34658765
PMCPMC8517450
OpenAlexW3202987425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.