ArticleIEEE sensors journal2021
Quantifying Signal Quality for Joint Acoustic Emissions Using Graph-Based Spectral Embedding.
Article in IEEE sensors journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Validating Joint Acoustic Emissions Models as a Generalizable Predictor of Joint Health.IEEE sensors journal · 2024Article
- Knee acoustic emissions as a noninvasive biomarker of articular health in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a clinical validation in an extended study population.Pediatric rheumatology online journal · 2023Article
- A Feasibility Study on Tribological Origins of Knee Acoustic Emissions.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We present a new method for quantifying signal quality of joint acoustic emissions (JAEs) from the knee during unloaded flexion/extension (F/E) exercises. For ten F/E cycles, JAEs were recorded, in a clinical setting, from 34 healthy knees and 13 with a meniscus tear (n=24 subjects). The recordings were first segmented by F/E cycle and described using time and frequency domain features. Using these features, a symmetric k-nearest neighbor graph was created and described using a spectral embedding. We show how the underlying community structure of JAEs was comparable across joint health levels and was highly affected by artifacts. Each F/E cycle was scored by its distance from a diverse set of manually annotated, clean templates and removed if above the artifact threshold. We validate this methodology by showing an improvement in the distinction between the JAEs of healthy and injured knees. Graph community factor (GCF) was used to detect the number of communities in each recording and describe the heterogeneity of JAEs from each knee. Before artifact removal, there was no significant difference between the healthy and injured groups due to the impact of artifacts on the community construction. Following implementation of artifact removal, we observed improvement in knee health classification. The GCF value for the meniscus tear group was significantly higher than the healthy group (p<0.01). With more JAE recordings being taken in the clinic and at home, this paper addresses the need for a robust artifact removal method which is necessary for an accurate description of joint health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.