Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34658617›Full record

ReviewArchives of computational methods in engineering : state of the art reviews2022

Automated Bacterial Classifications Using Machine Learning Based Computational Techniques: Architectures, Challenges and Open Research Issues.

Shallu Kotwal, Priya Rani, Tasleem Arif, Jatinder Manhas, Sparsh Sharma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of computational methods in engineering : state of the art reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Discrimination of CommonJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shallu KotwalDepartment of Information Technology, Baba Ghulam Shah Badshah University, Rajouri, India.
Priya RaniDepartment of Computer Science & IT, University of Jammu, Jammu, India.
Tasleem ArifDepartment of Information Technology, Baba Ghulam Shah Badshah University, Rajouri, India.
Jatinder ManhasDepartment of Computer Science & IT, Bhaderwah Campus, University of Jammu, Jammu, India.
Sparsh SharmaDepartment of Computer Science & Engineering, NIT Srinagar, Jammu, Jammu & Kashmir India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteria are important in a variety of practical domains, including industry, agriculture, medicine etc. A very few species of bacteria are favourable to humans. Whereas, majority of them are extremely dangerous and causes variety of life threatening illness to different living organisms. Traditionally, this class of microbes is detected and classified using different approaches like gram staining, biochemical testing, motility testing etc. However with the availability of large amount of data and technical advances in the field of medical and computer science, the machine learning methods have been widely used and have shown tremendous performance in automatic detection of bacteria. The inclusion of latest technology employing different Artificial Intelligence techniques are greatly assisting microbiologist in solving extremely complex problems in this domain. This paper presents a review of the literature on various machine learning approaches that have been used to classify bacteria, for the period 1998-2020. The resources include research papers and book chapters from different publishers of national and international repute such as Elsevier, Springer, IEEE, PLOS, etc. The study carried out a detailed and critical analysis of penetrating different Machine learning methodologies in the field of bacterial classification along with their limitations and future scope. In addition, different opportunities and challenges in implementing these techniques in the concerned field are also presented to provide a deep insight to the researchers working in this field.

Identifiers

PMID34658617
PMCPMC8505783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.