ReviewIndian journal of surgical oncology2021
Does Tumor Marking Before Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Helps Achieve Better Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Breast Conservative Surgery? A Systematic Review.
Review in Indian journal of surgical oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Oncological outcomes following extreme oncoplastic breast conserving surgery (eOPBCS) for locally advanced breast cancer (LABC): A systematic review and meta-analysis.Breast (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2025Pooled it
- Impact of margin distance on recurrence and survival following breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant systemic therapy.NPJ breast cancer · 2025Article
- Prognosis of patients with breast cancer who underwent breast-conserving surgery using a 3D-printed surgical guide after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Non-Invasive 3D Breast Tumor Localization: A Viable Alternative to Invasive Tumor Marking.Cancers · 2024Article
- Breast and axillary marking in the neoadjuvant setting: survey results from experts of the Brazilian society of mastology.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with breast cancer are increasingly being offered breast conserving surgery (BCS) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). We aimed to conduct a systematic review to assess the advantage of tumor marking in patients undergoing BCS after NACT. After registering the protocol for a systematic review with PROSPERO, a systematic search was conducted through September 30, 2020, for all studies involving patients undergoing BCS post NACT after tumor marking. Margin status on final histology was the primary outcome. Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (OCEBM) levels were used to assess internal validity. A total of 636 records from Medline/PubMed, 1381 from Embase, and 1422 from Cochrane library were extracted. After screening, 15 articles (1520 patients) were included for data synthesis. For marking, 6 studies used metallic markers and 5 used
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.