Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34658553›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of nuclear medicine : IJNM : the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, India

Biological Effects Associated with Internal and External Contamination of Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine Sources: An

Amit Nautiyal, Tanmoy Mondal, Alpana Goel, Subrata Kumar Dey, Deepanjan Mitra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of nuclear medicine : IJNM : the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, India. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Biological Effects Associated with Internal and External Contamination of Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine Sources: Correspondence.Indian journal of nuclear medicine : IJNM : the official journal of the Society of Nuclear Medicine, India
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amit NautiyalInstitute of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, AMRI Hospitals, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Tanmoy MondalDepartment of Biotechnology, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad University of Technology, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Alpana GoelAmity Institute of Nuclear Science and Technology, Amity University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Subrata Kumar DeyDepartment of Biotechnology, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad University of Technology, Kolkata, West Bengal, India.
Deepanjan MitraInstitute of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, AMRI Hospitals, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimIn a Nuclear Medicine department, the risk of external and internal contamination in radiation workers is much higher than in other medical radiation facilities. The risk associated with both types of contaminations should be quantified to estimate the radiation dose received by the personal. Here, we designed an METHODOLOGY: Chinese hamster lung fibroblast V79 was used for all of the experiments. Irradiation was performed internally and externally (scenarios activity is mixed with the cell line [Internal] and activity kept at 1 cm distance from cell line [external]) using two different diagnostic radioactive sources (Tc-99 m and F-18) of known quantity 37 MBq. Total cumulated activity (MBq-min) was calculated up to one half-life of sources for both internal and external setups. An alkaline single gel electrophoresis technique (comet assay) was used for DNA damage analysis. Olive tail moment (OTM) was used to characterize DNA damage.

resultsWe have not observed any significant difference (

conclusionsOur

Indexed as

18F-fluorodeoxyglucose99 mTcO4-DNA damageexternal contaminationinternal contamination

Identifiers

PMID34658553
PMCPMC8481857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.