ReviewWater, air, and soil pollution2021
Ecological Drawbacks of Nanomaterials Produced on an Industrial Scale: Collateral Effect on Human and Environmental Health.
Review in Water, air, and soil pollution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Narrative Review of Nanomaterial Interactions in Plants with a Focus on Multi-Omics and Epigenetic Remodeling.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Nanoenabled bioinnovations and decentralized climate-adaptive systems for enhancing agroenergetic resilience: a review article.Discover nano · 2025Review
- Progress and perspectives on microbial dye remediation: enzymatic pathways, microbial diversity, and hybrid microbial-based technologies.Archives of microbiology · 2025Review
- Metallic, carbon-based, and polymeric nanomaterials: transforming dairy farming practices for sustainability.Food chemistry: X · 2025Review
- Preparation and Characterization of Zein-Phosphate Nanoparticles by Nanoprecipitation Method with Potential Use as Fertilizer.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Multifaceted biomedical applications of biogenic titanium dioxide nanoparticles fabricated by marine actinobacterium Streptomyces vinaceusdrappus AMG31.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- From innovation to application: safety concerns in nanomaterial implant coatings.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2025Article
- Synthesis of metallic nanoparticles using biometabolites: mechanisms and applications.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2025Review
- The utilization of nanotechnology in the female reproductive system and related disorders.Heliyon · 2024Review
- A One-Step Approach for a Durable and Highly Hydrophobic Coating for Flax Fabrics for Self-Cleaning Application.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Nanobiotechnology to advance stress resilience in plants: Current opportunities and challenges.Materials today. Bio · 2023Review
- Assessment of the Tolerance of a ChlorophyteNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Currently, hundreds of different nanomaterials with a broad application in products that make daily lives a little bit easier, in every aspect, are being produced on an industrial scale at thousands of tons per year. However, several scientists, researchers, politics, and ordinary citizens have stated their concern regarding the life cycle, collateral effects, and final disposal of these cutting-edge materials. This review summarizes, describes, and discusses all manuscripts published in the Journal Citation Reports during the last 10 years, which studied the toxicity or the effects of nanomaterials on human and environmental health. It was observed that 23.62% of the manuscripts analyzed found no ecological or human risks; 54.39% showed that several nanomaterials have toxicological effects on the ecosystems, human, or environmental health. In comparison, only 21.97% stated the nanomaterials had a beneficial impact on those. Although only 54.39% of the manuscripts reported unfavorable effects of nanomaterials on ecosystems, human, or environmental health, it is relevant because the potential damage is invaluable. Therefore, it is imperative to make toxicological studies of nanomaterials with holistic focus under strictly controlled real conditions before their commercialization, to deliver to the market only innocuous and environmentally friendly products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.