ArticleThe journal of extra-corporeal technology2021
Cell Saver Blood Reinfusion Up to 24 Hours Post Collection in Pediatric Cardiac Surgical Patients Does Not Increase Incidence of Hospital-Acquired Infections or Mortality.
Article in The journal of extra-corporeal technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of Intraoperative and Postoperative Blood Cell Salvage Use in Cardiac Surgery with Cardiopulmonary Bypass.Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery · 2025Observational
- Successful Case of Double Valve Replacement Surgery Using Autologous Blood Transfusion: A Patient's Autonomy Preserved with Excellent Clinical Outcome.The American journal of case reports · 2024Article
- Turbulence in surgical suction heads as detected by MRI.The journal of extra-corporeal technology · 2023Article
- Allogeneic Red Blood Cell Transfusion and Infectious Complications Following Pediatric Spinal Fusion: NSQIP-P Analysis.JB & JS open accessArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cell saver blood reinfusion, a blood conservation technique recently available for pediatric use, is typically limited to 6 hours post processing to guard against bacterial contamination. We hypothesize that reinfusion of cell saver blood up to 24 hours post collection in children after cardiac surgery will not increase the incidence of hospital-acquired infections (HAI). The primary aim is to compare incidence of HAI between children receiving cell saver blood ≤6 hours vs. >6 to ≤24 hours from its collection. The secondary aim is to compare mortality and clinical outcomes. Retrospective chart review of children ≤18 years undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) from 2013 to 2018 when cell saver collection and bedside temperature controlled storage became standard of care. Patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) within 48 hours postoperatively and those who did not receive cell saver were excluded. The primary outcome was HAI incidence postoperative days 0-6. Demographic data included diagnosis, surgical severity score, and clinical outcomes. 466 patients, 45% female. No significant between-group differences identified. There was no significant difference in HAI (control 8.5% vs. treatment 8.0%,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.