Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34658392›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association2021

Agreement of primary outcomes in chiropractic-related clinical trials registered in clinicaltrials.gov with corresponding publication.

Robert M Coté, Stephen M Perle, Derek S Martin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Time to publication for results of clinical trials.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Robert M CotéCollege of Health Sciences, School of Chiropractic, University of Bridgeport.
Stephen M PerleCollege of Health Sciences, School of Chiropractic, University of Bridgeport.
Derek S MartinCollege of Health Sciences, School of Chiropractic, University of Bridgeport.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPrevious analysis of registered clinical trials has found a number of protocols result in changes in the registered primary outcome measures. This investigation determined if reported primary outcomes in chiropractic-related clinical trials registered in clinicaltrials.gov match their published results. Additionally, we assessed secondary outcomes, publication status and whether raw data were posted to the registry.

methodsClinicaltrials.gov was searched for chiropractic-related trials and having a completed status. If the study was published, outcome measures were compared between the clinicaltrials.gov entry and the published paper to assess for consistency.

resultsWithin clinicaltrials.gov 171 chiropracticrelated protocols were identified with 102 of those published (59.6% publication rate). Ninety-two of the published papers (90.2%) had agreement between their primary outcome and the entry on clinicaltrials.gov and 82 (80.4%) agreed with the secondary outcomes.

conclusionA modest rate of agreement between clinicaltrials.gov entries and the published papers was found. While chiropractic-related clinical trials are fewer compared to medical trials, chiropractic-related research has a substantially better rate of primary and secondary outcome concordance with registered protocols.

Indexed as

biaisbiaschiropracticclinical trial registryétat de la professionMOTS CLÉS: chiropratiquerapport de rechercheregistre d’essais cliniquesresearch reportstatus of the profession

Identifiers

PMID34658392
PMCPMC8480378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.