Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34658334›Full record

ArticleeLife2021

The OpenNeuro resource for sharing of neuroscience data.

Christopher J Markiewicz, Krzysztof J Gorgolewski, Franklin Feingold, Ross Blair, Yaroslav O Halchenko, Eric Miller, Nell Hardcastle, Joe Wexler, Oscar Esteban, Mathias Goncalves and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 237 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
237citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

237 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Building an open infrastructure for molecular neuroimaging: Standards and tools from the OpenNeuroPET initiative.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The human hippocampus can pattern separate memories by meaning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

177 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Christopher J MarkiewiczDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6533-164X
Krzysztof J GorgolewskiDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3321-7583
Franklin FeingoldDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6533-2909
Ross BlairDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3007-1056
Yaroslav O HalchenkoDepartment of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3456-2493
Eric MillerSquishymedia, Portland, United States.
Nell HardcastleSquishymedia, Portland, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3837-0707
Joe WexlerDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6424-8740
Oscar EstebanDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8435-6191
Mathias GoncalvesDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7252-7771
Anita JwaDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1462-424X
Russell PoldrackDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6755-0259

Funding

Resource DiscoveryP41EB019936 · NIBIB · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI David Nelson Kennedy · 2016 to 2026
$15.2M
OpenNeuro: An open archive for analysis and sharing of BRAIN Initiative dataR24MH117179 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Russell A Poldrack · 2018 to 2026
$11.6M
BIDS-Derivatives: A data standard for derived data and models in the BRAIN InitiativeR24MH114705 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI POLDRACK, RUSSELL A · 2017 to 2018
$1.4M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB019936NIMH NIH HHS R24 MH114705NIMH NIH HHS R24 MH117179
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sharing of research data is essential to ensure reproducibility and maximize the impact of public investments in scientific research. Here, we describe OpenNeuro, a BRAIN Initiative data archive that provides the ability to openly share data from a broad range of brain imaging data types following the FAIR principles for data sharing. We highlight the importance of the Brain Imaging Data Structure standard for enabling effective curation, sharing, and reuse of data. The archive presently shares more than 600 datasets including data from more than 20,000 participants, comprising multiple species and measurement modalities and a broad range of phenotypes. The impact of the shared data is evident in a growing number of published reuses, currently totalling more than 150 publications. We conclude by describing plans for future development and integration with other ongoing open science efforts.

Indexed as

BrainInformation DisseminationNeuroimagingDatabases, FactualHumansNeurosciencesdata sharingEEGhumanMEGmouseMRIneuroimagingneuroscienceopen sciencerat

Identifiers

PMID34658334
PMCPMC8550750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.