Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34658032›Full record

ArticleJournal of anatomy2022

Virtual reconstruction of orbital floor defects using a statistical shape model.

Mathieu Gass, Marc Anton Füßinger, Marc Christian Metzger, Steffen Schwarz, Johannes Daniel Bähr, Leonard Brandenburg, Julia Weingart, Stefan Schlager

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anatomy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Virtual reconstruction of orbital defects using Gaussian process morphable models.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Corrigendum.Journal of anatomy · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mathieu GassDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Albert-Ludwigs University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5015-9173
Marc Anton FüßingerDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Albert-Ludwigs University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4359-0744
Marc Christian MetzgerDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Albert-Ludwigs University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4893-7594
Steffen SchwarzDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Albert-Ludwigs University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3666-6667
Johannes Daniel BährDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Albert-Ludwigs University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0125-7193
Leonard BrandenburgDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Albert-Ludwigs University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4697-5287
Julia WeingartDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Albert-Ludwigs University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1438-9745
Stefan SchlagerDepartment of Physical Anthropology, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6493-9250
University of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe current standard in reconstructing defects of the orbital floor, by using the concept of mirroring, is time-consuming and ignores the natural asymmetry of the skull. By using a statistical shape model (SSM), the reconstruction can be automatized and improved in accuracy. The present study aims to show the possibilities of the virtual reconstruction of artificial defects of the orbital floor using an SSM and its potentials for clinical implementation.

methodsBased on 131 unaffected CT scans of the midface, an SSM was created which contained the shape variability of the orbital floor. Nineteen midface CT scans, that were not included in the SSM, were manually segmented to establish ground truth (control group). Then artificial defects of larger and smaller sizes were created and reconstructed using SSM (Group I) and the gold standard of mirroring (Group II). Eventually, a comparison to the surface of the manual segmentation (control group) was performed.

resultsThe proposed method of reconstruction using an SSM leads to more precise reconstruction results, compared with the conventional method of mirroring. Whereas mirroring led to the reconstruction errors of 0.7 mm for small defects and 0.73 mm for large defects, reconstruction using SSM led to deviations of 0.26 mm (small defect) and, respectively, 0.34 mm (large defect).

conclusionsThe presented approach is an effective and accurate method for reconstructing the orbital floor. In connection with modern computer-aided design and manufacturing, individual patient-specific implants could be produced according to SSM-based reconstructions and could replace current methods using manual bending techniques. By acknowledging the natural asymmetry of the human skull, the SSM-based approach achieves higher accuracy in reconstructing injured orbits.

Indexed as

OrbitPlastic Surgery ProceduresHumansModels, StatisticalSkullTomography, X-Ray Computedcomputer-assisted surgeryorbital reconstructionstatistical shape modeltrauma

Identifiers

PMID34658032
PMCPMC8742960
OpenAlexW3207515799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.