ArticleJournal of anatomy2022
Virtual reconstruction of orbital floor defects using a statistical shape model.
Article in Journal of anatomy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Automated virtual reduction of pseudo-fractured mandibles using sex-specific statistical shape models: a proof-of-concept study.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- Virtual reconstruction of orbital defects using Gaussian process morphable models.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024Article
- Reconstruction of dental roots for implant planning purposes: a retrospective computational and radiographic assessment of single-implant cases.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024Article
- Comparison of Anatomical Preformed Titanium Implants and Patient-Specific CAD/CAM Implants in the Primary Reconstruction of Isolated Orbital Fractures-A Retrospective Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Shape modelling of the oropharynx distinguishes associations with body morphology but not whiplash-associated disorder.Journal of anatomy · 2023Article
- Virtual reconstruction of midfacial bone defect based on generative adversarial network.Head & face medicine · 2022Article
- Primary Orbital Reconstruction with Selective Laser Melting (SLM) of Patient-Specific Implants (PSIs): An Overview of 96 Surgically Treated Patients.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Corrigendum.Journal of anatomy · 2022Article
- A Novel Method for Digital Reconstruction of the Mucogingival Borderline in Optical Scans of Dental Plaster Casts.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Virtual reconstruction of orbital floor defects using a statistical shape model.Journal of anatomy · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrigendum.2022
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe current standard in reconstructing defects of the orbital floor, by using the concept of mirroring, is time-consuming and ignores the natural asymmetry of the skull. By using a statistical shape model (SSM), the reconstruction can be automatized and improved in accuracy. The present study aims to show the possibilities of the virtual reconstruction of artificial defects of the orbital floor using an SSM and its potentials for clinical implementation.
methodsBased on 131 unaffected CT scans of the midface, an SSM was created which contained the shape variability of the orbital floor. Nineteen midface CT scans, that were not included in the SSM, were manually segmented to establish ground truth (control group). Then artificial defects of larger and smaller sizes were created and reconstructed using SSM (Group I) and the gold standard of mirroring (Group II). Eventually, a comparison to the surface of the manual segmentation (control group) was performed.
resultsThe proposed method of reconstruction using an SSM leads to more precise reconstruction results, compared with the conventional method of mirroring. Whereas mirroring led to the reconstruction errors of 0.7 mm for small defects and 0.73 mm for large defects, reconstruction using SSM led to deviations of 0.26 mm (small defect) and, respectively, 0.34 mm (large defect).
conclusionsThe presented approach is an effective and accurate method for reconstructing the orbital floor. In connection with modern computer-aided design and manufacturing, individual patient-specific implants could be produced according to SSM-based reconstructions and could replace current methods using manual bending techniques. By acknowledging the natural asymmetry of the human skull, the SSM-based approach achieves higher accuracy in reconstructing injured orbits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.