Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34658022›Full record

ArticleEvolution; international journal of organic evolution2021

What do orange spots reveal about male (and female) guppies? A test using correlated responses to selection.

Magdalena Herdegen-Radwan, Silvia Cattelan, Jakub Buda, Jarosław Raubic, Jacek Radwan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution; international journal of organic evolution, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Magdalena Herdegen-RadwanDepartment of Behavioural Ecology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, Poznan, 61-614, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6593-3256
Silvia CattelanDepartment of Biology, University of Padova, Padova, 35121, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6303-8810
Jakub BudaDepartment of Animal Taxonomy and Ecology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, Poznan, 61-614, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4584-5897
Jarosław RaubicPopulation Ecology Group, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, Poznan, 61-614, Poland.
Jacek RadwanEvolutionary Biology Group, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan, Poznan, 61-614, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8503-5701
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań · PLUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Female preferences for male ornamental traits can arise from indirect benefits, such as increased attractiveness or better viability of progeny, but empirical evidence for such benefits is inconsistent. Artificial selection offers a powerful way to investigate indirect effects of male ornaments. Here, we selected for the area of orange spots on male guppies, a trait subject to female preferences in our population, in replicated up- and down-selected lines. We found a significant direct response to selection, and a correlated response in female preferences, with females from down-selected lines showing less interest in more orange males. Nevertheless, up-selected males sired more offspring in direct competition with low-selected males, irrespective of female origin. We did not find a significantly correlated response to selection among any other fitness correlates we measured. Our results imply that female preferences for orange spots can lead to increased reproductive success of their sons, with no effect on general viability of progeny. Furthermore, although we demonstrate that female preferences may evolve via linkage disequilibrium with the preferred trait, the potential for runaway selection by positive feedback may be constrained by the lack of corresponding linkage with male reproductive competitiveness.

Indexed as

Citrus sinensisPoeciliaAnimalsFemaleMalePhenotypeReproductionSexual Behavior, AnimalOrnamentsPoecilia reticulatapreferencessexual selection

Identifiers

PMID34658022
PMCPMC9299167
OpenAlexW3207798465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.