Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34657763›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)2022

Vincristine dosing, drug exposure and therapeutic drug monitoring in neonate and infant cancer patients.

Shelby Barnett, Farina Hellmann, Elizabeth Parke, Guy Makin, Deborah A Tweddle, Caroline Osborne, Georg Hempel, Gareth J Veal

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Haematologica · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Shelby BarnettNewcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Farina HellmannDepartment of Pharmaceutical and Medical Chemistry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Elizabeth ParkeNewcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Guy MakinDivision of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Manchester, UK.
Deborah A TweddleNewcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK; Great North Children's Hospital, Newcastle, UK.
Caroline OsbornePharmacy Department, Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Georg HempelDepartment of Pharmaceutical and Medical Chemistry, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Gareth J VealNewcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. Electronic address: G.J.Veal@ncl.ac.uk.
Newcastle University · GBUniversity of Münster · DEAlder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust · GBGreat North Children's Hospital · GBNewcastle College · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK C9380/A25138Cancer Research UK C9380/A25169Department of Health PB-PG-1216-20032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe anticancer drug vincristine is associated with potentially dose-limiting side-effects, including neurotoxicity and myelosuppression. However, there currently exists a lack of published clinical pharmacology data relating to its use in neonate and infant patients. We report a study investigating vincristine dosing and drug exposure, alongside the feasibility and impact of a therapeutic drug monitoring treatment approach, in this challenging patient population. PATIENTS AND

methodsVincristine pharmacokinetic data from a total of 57 childhood cancer patients, including 26 neonates and infants, were used to characterise a population pharmacokinetic model. Vincristine was administered at doses of 0.02-0.05 mg/kg or 0.75-1.5 mg/m

resultsA two-compartment model provided the best fit for the population analysis. There was no significant difference in vincristine clearance normalised for body surface area between neonates/infants and older children. Lower doses administered to neonates and infants resulted in significantly lower drug exposures (area under the curve [AUC]), compared with older children (p = 0.047). Vincristine doses of <0.05 mg/kg in neonates and infants resulted in significantly lower AUC values than observed in those receiving doses of ≥0.05 mg/kg (p ≤ 0.0001). Therapeutic drug monitoring was shown to be feasible, effective and well tolerated in neonates and infants experiencing suboptimal drug exposures.

conclusionDoses of <0.05 mg/kg should not be used in neonate and infant patients because of a high risk of patients experiencing potentially suboptimal drug exposures. Therapeutic drug monitoring approaches in neonates and infants are supported by the data generated, with a proposed target therapeutic window of 50-100 μg/l∗h.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsNeoplasmsAdolescentArea Under CurveChildDrug MonitoringHumansInfantInfant, NewbornVincristineAntineoplastic AgentsVincristineChemotherapyDosingInfantsNeonatesPaediatricsPharmacokineticsTherapeutic drug monitoringVincristine

Identifiers

PMID34657763
PMCPMC8914346
OpenAlexW3203445956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.