Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34657627›Full record

ArticleHarm reduction journal2021

Generating evidence on the use of Image and performance enhancing drugs in the UK: results from a scoping review and expert consultation by the Anabolic Steroid UK network.

Jim McVeigh, Evelyn Hearne, Ian Boardley, Geoff Bates, Vivian Hope, Rob Ralphs, Marie Claire Van Hout

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Harm reduction journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jim McVeighSubstance Use & Associated Behaviours, Department of Sociology, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK. j.mcveigh@mmu.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-5319-6885
Evelyn HearnePublic Health Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
Ian BoardleySchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Geoff BatesInstitute for Policy Research, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
Vivian HopePublic Health Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
Rob RalphsSubstance Use & Associated Behaviours, Department of Sociology, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, UK.
Marie Claire Van HoutFaculty of Health, Public Health Institute, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK.
Liverpool John Moores University · GBManchester Metropolitan University · GBUniversity of Bath · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

Department of Health NIHR132730
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of anabolic androgenic steroids (AAS) and associated image and performance enhancing drugs (IPEDs) is now a global phenomenon. There is a need to develop evidence to support the development of interventions to prevent the commencement of use, to minimise the potential harms or to support those in their cessation of use. While the United Kingdom (UK) is no exception to this issue, its public health and legislative response to the phenomenon differs to other countries and requires the examination of research specific to the UK. Therefore, a scoping review has been conducted to examine the recent relevant literature to help inform the development and evaluation of effective interventions to reduce the harmful use of IPEDs.

methodsA comprehensive search strategy was developed for multiple bibliographic databases, supported by and iterative citation searching process and complimented by expert input from the Anabolic Steroid UK Network. Research conducted by or UK academics or within the UK were eligible, if published in the previous five years.

resultsIn total 87 eligible outputs were identified, including 26 review articles, 25 qualitative papers and 24 quantitative papers. together with small numbers of clinical studies/case reports (6) and commentaries/correspondence (6). The most common topics of research were public health, treatment and harm reduction (41), followed by studies focusing on epidemiology, sub-groups of people using IPEDs and motivations for use (34). The studies illustrated the diverse populations of people who use a range of enhancement drugs including concomitant psychoactive drug use. A number of papers focused on blood borne viruses and associated issues, while others reported on the uptake of needle and syringe programmes. No effectiveness evaluations related to any aspect of treatment, harm reduction or other intervention were published during study period.

conclusionThere is a need for the development of effectiveness evaluations of current interventions and any future service provision for people using image and performance enhancing drugs. While there have been no studies of this nature to date, this review illustrates the rich data that has been gathered through diverse methodologies, that will assist in the development of future effectiveness evaluations.

Indexed as

Performance-Enhancing SubstancesHarm ReductionHumansReferral and ConsultationTestosterone CongenersUnited KingdomPerformance-Enhancing SubstancesTestosterone CongenersImage and performance enhancement drugsIPEDSReviewUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID34657627
PMCPMC8522223
OpenAlexW3205528098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.