Trial reportEpilepsia open2022
Experience of perampanel monotherapy beyond initial titration to achieve seizure freedom in patients with focal-onset seizures with newly diagnosed or currently untreated recurrent epilepsy: A post hoc analysis of the open-label Study 342 (FREEDOM).
Trial report in Epilepsia open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03201900 (A Multicenter, Uncontrolled, Open-label Study and Extension Study for Verification of Eefficacy and Safety for Perampanel Monotherapy in Untreated Patients With Partial Onset Seizures), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multicenter, Uncontrolled, Open-label Study and Extension Study for Verification of Eefficacy and Safety for Perampanel Monotherapy in Untreated Patients With Partial Onset Seizures (Including Secondarily Generalized Seizures) (FREEDOM Study)
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and tolerability of perampanel in patients with seizures in real-world clinical practice: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Pooled it
- Trial
- Perampanel as first line monotherapy for seizure in japan. A single-centre real-world study.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2025Article
- Efficacy and safety of perampanel monotherapy in Chinese children with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy: a single-center prospective study.Translational pediatrics · 2025Article
- Article
- Clinical efficacy and safety of perampanel monotherapy as primary anti-seizure medication in the treatment of pediatric epilepsy: A single-center, prospective, observational study.Epilepsia open · 2024Observational
- The Fundamentals of Antiseizure Medications: A Through Z.Epilepsy currents · 2024Article
- Efficacy and safety of perampanel monotherapy in Chinese patients with focal-onset seizures: A single-center, prospective, real-world observational study.Epilepsia open · 2023Observational
- The Efficacy and Cognitive Impact of Perampanel Monotherapy in Patients with Self-Limited Epilepsy with Centrotemporal Spikes: A Retrospective Analysis.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis post hoc analysis evaluated whether continued treatment with perampanel monotherapy beyond initial titration may be appropriate for patients with focal-onset seizures (FOS) with currently untreated epilepsy to achieve seizure freedom with an effective dose.
methodsStudy 342 (NCT03201900; FREEDOM) is a single-arm, open-label, Phase III study of perampanel monotherapy. Patients aged ≥12 years with untreated FOS received perampanel 4 mg/d in a 32-week Treatment Phase (6-week Titration and 26-week Maintenance Periods); in case of seizure(s) during Maintenance Period, patients could enter a 30-week Treatment Phase (4-week Titration and 26-week Maintenance Periods) to be up-titrated to perampanel 8 mg/d. The primary endpoint was seizure-freedom rate during Maintenance Period in the modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) Analysis Set (patients who had ≥1 post-dose efficacy measurement during Maintenance Period); safety was monitored. This analysis of 4-mg/d efficacy data assessed the proportion of patients achieving seizure freedom during the Maintenance Period (responders) relative to patients with an early/later response (depending on seizure status during the Titration Period).
resultsIn the mITT population (n = 73), 46 patients were 4-mg/d responders; of whom, 37 (80.4%) were early responders and nine (19.6%) were later responders. The mean (standard deviation) percent reductions in FOS frequency from baseline at the end of the 4-mg/d Titration Period were 100.0% (0.0%; early responders) and 46.3% (97.3%; later responders). Among the 27 4-mg/d nonresponders, nine (33.3%) patients who had an early response experienced seizure(s) during the subsequent 4-mg/d Maintenance Period. Safety outcomes were similar, regardless of responder status, without new safety concerns. SIGNIFICANCE: Some patients with untreated FOS may benefit from continued treatment beyond initial titration of perampanel monotherapy to achieve seizure freedom, suggesting that it may not be appropriate to make treatment decisions to discontinue or switch from perampanel monotherapy solely based on seizure response before an effective dose has been reached.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.