Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34657346›Full record

Trial reportHealth & social care in the community2022

Cost-effectiveness of exergaming compared to regular day-care activities in dementia: Results of a randomised controlled trial in The Netherlands.

Joeke van Santen, Franka J M Meiland, Rose-Marie Dröes, Annemieke van Straten, Judith E Bosmans

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Health & social care in the community, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Exergaming for dementia and mild cognitive impairment.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joeke van SantenDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7486-167X
Franka J M MeilandDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6219-5390
Rose-Marie DröesDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4812-1229
Annemieke van StratenAmsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6875-2215
Judith E BosmansDepartment of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1443-1026

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing number of people living with dementia will result in increased costs of dementia worldwide. The e-Health intervention 'Exergaming' may improve health and quality of life of people with dementia, but the cost-effectiveness is unknown. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of exergaming compared to regular activities from a societal perspective in day-care centres (DCC) for people with dementia and their informal caregivers (IC) alongside a cluster randomised controlled trial. We included 112 dyads (person with dementia and IC) from 20 psychogeriatric DCCs (11 exergaming, 9 control) across the Netherlands. Exergaming consisted of interactive cycling at least twice a week for 6 months. Measurements were conducted at baseline (T0), after 3 (T1) and 6 (T2) months. Primary outcomes were minutes of physical activity, mobility of the participants with dementia (Short Physical Performances Battery, SPPB), and Quality-Adjusted Life-Years (QALYs) of participants with dementia and ICs. ICs filled out cost diaries to measure healthcare and informal care utilisation during the study. There were no statistically significant differences in outcomes or costs between the groups at the level of participants with dementia, the ICs or the dyad. With regard to QALYs and SPPB, the probability that exergaming is cost-effective compared to control was low for all possible willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds. However, for physical activity at WTP thresholds of 0, 50 and 250 Euros per additional minute of physical activity, the probability of cost-effectiveness is 0.46, 0.84 and 0.87, respectively. Exergaming in DCC was not cost-effective compared to usual activities. However, considering the small sample size and the large number of missing observations, findings should be interpreted with caution. Future studies with larger samples are recommended to obtain definitive answers on the cost-effectiveness of exergaming. This trial was registered in the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR5537/NL5420).

Indexed as

DementiaQuality of LifeCaregiversCost-Benefit AnalysisHumansNetherlandscosts and cost analysisdementiaexercisehealthcare costsphysical fitnessquality of liferandomised controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID34657346
PMCPMC9544668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.