Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34657296›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of animal ecology2022

A guide to pre-processing high-throughput animal tracking data.

Pratik Rajan Gupte, Christine E Beardsworth, Orr Spiegel, Emmanuel Lourie, Sivan Toledo, Ran Nathan, Allert I Bijleveld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of animal ecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pratik Rajan GupteGroningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5294-7819
Christine E BeardsworthDepartment of Coastal Systems, NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Den Burg, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1308-1455
Orr SpiegelSchool of Zoology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-8941-3175
Emmanuel LourieMinerva Center for Movement Ecology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-7364-0082
Sivan ToledoMinerva Center for Movement Ecology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-9524-7115
Ran NathanMinerva Center for Movement Ecology, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-5733-6715
Allert I BijleveldDepartment of Coastal Systems, NIOZ Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Den Burg, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3159-8944

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modern, high-throughput animal tracking increasingly yields 'big data' at very fine temporal scales. At these scales, location error can exceed the animal's step size, leading to mis-estimation of behaviours inferred from movement. 'Cleaning' the data to reduce location errors is one of the main ways to deal with position uncertainty. Although data cleaning is widely recommended, inclusive, uniform guidance on this crucial step, and on how to organise the cleaning of massive datasets, is relatively scarce. A pipeline for cleaning massive high-throughput datasets must balance ease of use and computationally efficiency, in which location errors are rejected while preserving valid animal movements. Another useful feature of a pre-processing pipeline is efficiently segmenting and clustering location data for statistical methods while also being scalable to large datasets and robust to imperfect sampling. Manual methods being prohibitively time-consuming, and to boost reproducibility, pre-processing pipelines must be automated. We provide guidance on building pipelines for pre-processing high-throughput animal tracking data to prepare it for subsequent analyses. We apply our proposed pipeline to simulated movement data with location errors, and also show how large volumes of cleaned data can be transformed into biologically meaningful 'residence patches', for exploratory inference on animal space use. We use tracking data from the Wadden Sea ATLAS system (WATLAS) to show how pre-processing improves its quality, and to verify the usefulness of the residence patch method. Finally, with tracks from Egyptian fruit bats Rousettus aegyptiacus, we demonstrate the pre-processing pipeline and residence patch method in a fully worked out example. To help with fast implementation of standardised methods, we developed the R package atlastools, which we also introduce here. Our pre-processing pipeline and atlastools can be used with any high-throughput animal movement data in which the high data-volume combined with knowledge of the tracked individuals' movement capacity can be used to reduce location errors. atlastools is easy to use for beginners while providing a template for further development. The common use of simple yet robust pre-processing steps promotes standardised methods in the field of movement ecology and leads to better inferences from data.

Indexed as

MovementAnimalsReproducibility of ResultsatlastoolsATLAS trackingbig databiotelemetrydata cleaninghigh-throughput movement ecologyresidence patchreverse GPS

Identifiers

PMID34657296
PMCPMC9299236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.