Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34657270›Full record

ArticleMolecular biology reports2021

Identification of metallo-β-lactamases and AmpC production among Escherichia coli strains isolated from hemodialysis patients with urinary tract infection.

Aghil Bahramian, Saeed Khoshnood, Nader Hashemi, Melika Moradi, Mohammadmahdi Karimi-Yazdi, Nahid Jalallou, Morteza Saki

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular biology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria-A Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  7. Co-Production of NDM-1 and OXA-10 β-Lactamase inInfection and drug resistance · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Aghil BahramianDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Saeed KhoshnoodClinical Microbiology Research Center, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran.
Nader HashemiDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Melika MoradiDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Mohammadmahdi Karimi-YazdiFaculty of Paramedical Sciences, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Nahid JalallouDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. nahidjalallou@yahoo.com.
Morteza SakiDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran. mortezasaki1981@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7419-0116
Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences · IRAja University of Medical Sciences · IRMazandaran University of Medical Sciences · IRMedical University of Ilam · IRShahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to identify metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) and AmpC β-lactamases-producing Escherichia coli isolates obtained from hemodialysis (HD) patients with urinary tract infections (UTI). METHODS AND

resultsA total of 257 HD patients with UTI were included in this study, from which 47 E. coli isolates were collected. Antibiotic susceptibility was tested by disc diffusion method. MBLs and AmpC production were phenotypically detected by imipenem-ethylenediaminetetracetate and cefoxitin/boronic acid assays, respectively. The presence of MBLs and AmpC genes was examined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Fosfomycin and ampicillin were the most and the least effective antibiotics against E. coli isolates, respectively. Moreover, 61.7% (29/47) of E. coli isolates were multidrug-resistant with seven different antibiotypes. Antibiotype V (AMP-CIP-IMP-MEM-CPD-CRO-CTX-GEN-LEV-SXT-TOB) was the most prevalent profile. Besides, 24 (51.1%) isolates were simultaneously resistant to imipenem and meropenem. Phenotypic assay showed MBL production in 16 (66.7%) of the 24 carbapenem-resistant E. coli isolates. The distribution of MBL genes in carbapenem-resistant E. coli was as follows: bla

conclusionsThe emergence of MBL and AmpC coproducing E. coli isolates calls for an urgent surveillance program for timely diagnosis and screening of these genes in our healthcare systems.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasesCarbapenemsDrug Resistance, MicrobialEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsEscherichia coli ProteinsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsRenal DialysisUrinary Tract InfectionsAmpC beta-lactamasesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasesCarbapenemsEscherichia coli ProteinsAmpCEscherichia coliHemodialysis patientsMetallo-β-lactamasesUrinary tract infections

Identifiers

PMID34657270
PMCPMC8520576
OpenAlexW3207680304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.