ArticleJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2022
Direct oral anticoagulants for secondary stroke prevention in patients over 80 years of age: the role of geriatric functional status.
Article in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prescribing anticoagulation therapy in very old (≥ 80-years) patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is an emerging clinical issue, but current knowledge and recommendations are insufficient. We aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in secondary stroke prevention in very old patients and to explore the related geriatric functional status of these patients. Three hundred fifty-three consecutive ≥ 80-year-old patients treated for transient ischemic attack (TIA) or ischemic stroke (IS) at the neurological clinic at UMC Ljubljana, who were prescribed DOACs for AF between December 2012 and May 2020, were included. Data regarding recurrent TIA/IS, major bleeds, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and death were collected. Data were descriptively compared with data from RCTs- including younger patients. Patients prescribed DOACs between January 2018 and May 2020 were contacted in December 2020, and their functional status was assessed using the Barthel index (BI). The efficacy of secondary stroke prevention with DOACs was comparable to RCTs for significantly younger patients. Major bleeds occurred more often, but most incidences were gastrointestinal, and the rate of ICH was comparable. Importantly, most patients were highly independent determined by BI. Overall, our real world results suggest that DOACs are as effective at preventing IS in secondary prevention in very old patients than in younger patients and that geriatric functional assessment could be a useful tool in the decision-making process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.