ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2021
Imaging Coronary Allograft Vasculopathy with Cardiac PET and Cardiac MRI.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Discharge AI-ECG-Derived Age and Incidence of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy at 3 Years: A Pilot Study.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Article
- Article
- Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy: A Focus on Advances in Diagnosis and Management.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2025Review
- Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy: Challenges and Advances in Invasive and Non-Invasive Diagnostic Modalities.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Review
- Coronary allograft vasculopathy in post-heart transplant patients: pathogenesis and role of cardiac computed tomography in diagnosis-a comprehensive review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewCoronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in heart transplant patients. It presents a diagnostic challenge as early CAV is often clinically silent, and it affects both epicardial coronary arteries and microvasculature. This review outlines the role of cardiac positron emission tomography (PET) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in the diagnosis and prognosis of CAV. RECENT
findingsRelative myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and quantitative myocardial blood flow using cardiac PET are useful in the diagnosis and prognosis of CAV. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and quantitative measures including myocardial perfusion reserve and mean diastolic rate using CMR are useful in the diagnosis and prognosis of CAV. Cardiac PET is now established as a non-invasive imaging modality for screening and monitoring for CAV, and CMR has demonstrated promise in this application. Further investigation of these modalities is needed with larger, multicenter studies that follow patients serially to demonstrate the clinical implications of using these modalities to detect early CAV and alter therapies to improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34657220What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.