Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34657188›Full record

ReviewRadiation and environmental biophysics2021

Areas of research to support the system of radiological protection.

D Laurier, W Rühm, F Paquet, K Applegate, D Cool, C Clement, International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP)

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Radiation and environmental biophysics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Biological effects of high-LET irradiation on the circulatory system.International journal of radiation biology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Radiological protection revisited-the story continues.Radiation and environmental biophysics · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

D LaurierInstitut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), Fontenay-aux-Roses, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1432-4738
W RühmHelmholtz Center Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany. werner.ruehm@helmholtz-muenchen.de.ORCID 0000-0002-6354-7359
F PaquetInstitut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), Cadarache, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0369-3423
K ApplegateUniversity of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7716-1636
D CoolInternational Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) Vice-Chair, Charlotte, NC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4105-0242
C ClementInternational Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1343-2585
International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP)

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This document presents the ICRP's updated vision on "Areas of Research to Support the System of Radiological Protection", which have been previously published in 2017. It aims to complement the research priorities promoted by other relevant international organisations, with the specificity of placing them in the perspective of the evolution of the System of Radiological Protection. This document contributes to the process launched by ICRP to review and revise the System of Radiological Protection that will update the 2007 General Recommendations in ICRP Publication 103.

Indexed as

International AgenciesRadiation ProtectionRadiation dosimetryRadiation effectsRadiological protection

Identifiers

PMID34657188
PMCPMC8522113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.