Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34657178›Full record

ArticleOecologia2021

Do different growth rates of trees cause distinct habitat qualities for saproxylic assemblages?

Kadri Runnel, Jörg G Stephan, Mats Jonsell, Kadi Kutser, Asko Lõhmus, Joachim Strengbom, Heidi Tamm, Thomas Ranius

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oecologia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 91% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kadri RunnelDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7044, 75007, Uppsala, Sweden. kadri.runnel@ut.ee.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7308-3623
Jörg G StephanSLU Swedish Species Information Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7007, 75007, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6195-7867
Mats JonsellDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7044, 75007, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0360-2651
Kadi KutserInstitute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Vanemuise 46, 51003, Tartu, Estonia.
Asko LõhmusInstitute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Vanemuise 46, 51003, Tartu, Estonia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7283-8716
Joachim StrengbomDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7044, 75007, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1720-5016
Heidi TammInstitute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, Vanemuise 46, 51003, Tartu, Estonia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1454-3626
Thomas RaniusDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7044, 75007, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7403-3348
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SEUniversity of Tartu · EE

Funding

eesti teadusagentuur IUT 34-7svenska forskningsrådet formas 2015-904svenska forskningsrådet formas 2018-05973
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In production forests, a common silvicultural objective is enhancing tree growth rates. The growth rate influences both mechanical and biochemical properties of wood, which may have an impact on dead wood inhabiting (i.e. saproxylic) species. In this study, we tested for the first time whether tree growth rates affect dead-wood associated assemblages in general and the occurrence of red-listed species in particular. We sampled saproxylic beetles (eclector traps) and fungi (DNA metabarcoding of wood samples) in dead trunks of Norway spruce (Picea abies), which had different growth rates within the same hemiboreal forests in Sweden. A high proportion of fungi showed a positive association to increasing tree growth. This resulted in higher fungal richness in fast-grown trees both at the trunk scale and across multiple studied trunks. Such patterns were not observed for saproxylic beetles. However, a set of species (both beetles and fungi) preferred slow-grown wood. Moreover, the total number of red-listed species was highest in slow-grown trunks. We conclude that dead wood from slow-grown trees hosts relatively fewer saproxylic species, but a part of these may be vulnerable to production forestry. It implies that slow-grown trees should be a target in nature conservation. However, where slow-grown trees are absent, for instance in forests managed for a high biomass production, increasing the volumes of dead wood from fast-grown trees may support many species.

Indexed as

ColeopteraTreesAnimalsEcosystemForestryForestsBiotic homogenizationCoarse woody debrisJoint species distribution modelMicrobiotaThreatened species

Identifiers

PMID34657178
PMCPMC8585823
OpenAlexW3206275114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.