SynthesisTranslational psychiatry2021
The effectiveness of enhanced evidence-based care for depressive disorders: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Translational psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Measurement-Based Care to Enhance Antidepressant Treatment Outcomes in Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2025Trial
- A pilot randomized controlled trial of an outreach intervention to improve depression treatment initiation among racial and ethnic groups.General hospital psychiatryTrial
- Interrater Reliability and Measurement Error of the Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised in Adolescents.JAACAP open · 2025Article
- Sleep and Activity Patterns as Transdiagnostic Behavioral Biomarkers in Psychiatry: Longitudinal Observational Study From the DeeP-DD Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Observational
- Micro-costing analysis of a community-based psychiatric intervention among people who inject drugs in Haiphong, Vietnam.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Translational implications of circadian activity alterations in an experimental model of late-onset depression induced by prenatal excess of glucocorticoids.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2025Review
- Factors influencing virtual collaborative care outcomes for depression and anxiety.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2024Article
- Prospective study of antidepressant treatment of psychiatric patients with depressive disorders: treatment adequacy and outcomes.BMC psychiatry · 2023Article
- Predicting Poor Outcomes Among Individuals Seeking Care for Major Depressive Disorder.Psychiatric research and clinical practice · 2022Article
- Patient perspectives for improving treatment initiation for new episodes of depression in historically minoritized racial and ethnic groups.General hospital psychiatryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several care models have been developed to improve treatment for depression, all of which provide "enhanced" evidence-based care (EEC). The essential component of these approaches is Measurement-Based Care (MBC). Specifically, Collaborative Care (CC), and Algorithm-guided Treatment (AGT), and Integrated Care (IC) all use varying forms of rigorous MBC assessment, care management, and/or treatment algorithms as key instruments to optimize treatment delivery and outcomes for depression. This meta-analysis systematically examined the effectiveness of EEC versus usual care for depressive disorders based on cluster-randomized studies or randomized controlled trials (RCTs). PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and PsycInfo, EMBASE, up to January 6th, 2020 were searched for this meta-analysis. The electronic search was supplemented by a manual search. Standardized mean difference (SMD), risk ratio (RR), and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and analyzed. A total of 29 studies with 15,255 participants were analyzed. EEC showed better effectiveness with the pooled RR for response of 1.30 (95%CI: 1.13-1.50, I
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.