Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34657138›Full record

Trial reportHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2022

Brief report on a phase I/IIa study to assess the safety, tolerability, and immune response of AGMG0201 in patients with essential hypertension.

Hironori Nakagami, Tetsuya Ishihama, Yuichi Daikyoji, Chieka Sasakura, Ei Yamada, Ryuichi Morishita

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Challenges in the development of novel therapies, vaccines and siRNAs for the treatment of hypertension.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Latest hypertension research to inform clinical practice in Asia.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Clinical study on angiotensin II vaccination-the first big step.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hironori NakagamiDepartment of Health Development and Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan. nakagami@gts.med.osaka-u.ac.jp.
Tetsuya IshihamaAnGes, Inc., 4-13-3, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-0014, Japan.
Yuichi DaikyojiAnGes, Inc., 4-13-3, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-0014, Japan.
Chieka SasakuraAnGes, Inc., 4-13-3, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-0014, Japan.
Ei YamadaAnGes, Inc., 4-13-3, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-0014, Japan.
Ryuichi MorishitaDepartment of Clinical Gene Therapy, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 2-2 Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.
Anges (Japan) · JPOsaka University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have been developing an angiotensin II vaccine for hypertension. We conducted a placebo-controlled dose escalation study to investigate the safety, tolerability, and immunological responses of this angiotensin II vaccine (AGMG0201). AGMG0201 was administered to participants with mild to moderate hypertension between 18 and 79 years of age. Twelve patients each were enrolled in the low-dose and high-dose groups. Within each group, subjects were randomly assigned to receive either the active study drug or a placebo at a ratio of 3:1. Each participant received a single intramuscular injection, followed by a second injection 30 days later, and was monitored for 360 days after the second dose. The results showed that most treatment-related adverse events were classified as mild or moderate in severity, including pain and erythema at the injection site. Anti-angiotensin II antibodies were observed in the AGMG0201 patients, especially in the high-dose group. Overall, AGMG0201 was well tolerated.

Indexed as

ImmunityImmunogenicity, VaccineDouble-Blind MethodEssential HypertensionHumansInjections, IntramuscularAngiotensin IIHypertensionVaccine

Identifiers

PMID34657138
PMCPMC8668431
OpenAlexW3206844048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.