ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2022
Rare Variants in RPPH1 Real-Time Quantitative PCR Control Assay Binding Sites Result in Incorrect Copy Number Calls.
Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- StarTRAC-Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Article
- PharmVar Tutorial on CYP2D6 Structural Variation Testing and Recommendations on Reporting.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2023Review
- Genotyping, characterization, and imputation of known and novel CYP2A6 structural variants using SNP array data.Journal of human genetics · 2023Article
- Determination of the DuplicatedJournal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) using RPPH1 as a reference gene is a standard method for assessment and validation of genomic copy number variations. However, variants in the reference amplicon may cause errors, which was investigated herein. While conducting copy number variation validations for birth defects research studies, 13 of 1634 specimens with multiple loci that appeared to be present as three copies were unexpectedly detected. This apparent trisomy was hypothesized to be an amplification artifact caused by a variant in the RPPH1 amplicon. Sequencing revealed all 13 individuals carried one of the four different variants within the RPPH1 amplicon. These variants could produce allelic dropout or altered reaction efficiency, causing an inaccurate measurement of copy number. Additional genotyping predicted a low frequency of the most common variant (rs3093876; 14/3562 alleles; minor allele frequency, 0.39%). Laboratories should recognize the potential for inaccurate results when using a single qPCR control assay. Overestimated CFTR and SMN2 copy numbers identified during newborn screening that otherwise would have been incorrectly called were also detected. Variants in reference loci may produce false-negative normal results for test loci when real deletions are present. For clinical laboratories screening for heterozygous deletions for diagnostic testing or prenatal/carrier screening via qPCR, the most cost-effective solution to maximize sensitivity is to run triplex reactions targeting the region of interest with two control genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.