Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34656551›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2022

A prospective analysis of the relationship between sexual acceptability and contraceptive satisfaction over time.

Renee D Kramer, Jenny A Higgins, Bethany Everett, David K Turok, Jessica N Sanders

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Renee D KramerDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI. Electronic address: renee.kramer@wisc.edu.
Jenny A HigginsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI; Departments of Gender and Women's Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
Bethany EverettDepartment of Sociology, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
David K TurokDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
Jessica N SandersDepartments of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT.
University of Utah · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Utah Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR002538 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI HESS, RACHEL, MAJERSIK, JENNIFER JUHL · 2018 to 2022
$26.0M
Center for Demography and EcologyR24HD047873 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI RAYMO, JAMES M · 2004 to 2013
$7.2M
Diversity supplementT32HD007014 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Katherine J. Curtis · 1985 to 2026
$6.8M
University of Utah Center for Clinical and Translational Science-UL1UL1TR000105 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI MCCLAIN, DONALD A. · 2012 to 2013
$5.1M
Scientific and Technical CoreP2CHD047873 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI Katherine J. Curtis · 2014 to 2026
$5.1M
Utah Building Interdisciplinary Resreach Careers in Women's Health Career Development ProgramK12HD085852 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI VARNER, MICHAEL W. · 2015 to 2019
$2.3M
Sexual Acceptability's Role in Women's Contraceptive Preference and BehaviorR01HD095661 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI HIGGINS, JENNY A. · 2017 to 2020
$1.4M
Role of Stress in Shaping Maternal, Infant, and Child OutcomesR01HD091405 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI EVERETT, BETHANY · 2018 to 2020
$959k
Midcareer Investigator Award in Patient-Oriented Research K24K24HD087436 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI TUROK, DAVID · 2017 to 2021
$942k
Leveraging Linked Data to Evaluate Social and Spatial Disparities in Contraception Access and Regional Program ImpactsK01HS027220 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI SANDERS, JESSICA N · 2020 to 2022
$471k
AHRQ HHS K01 HS027220NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000105NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002538NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD085852NICHD NIH HHS K24 HD087436NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD047873NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD091405NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD095661NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD047873NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContraceptives are used to prevent unwanted pregnancies and treat certain gynecologic conditions, but many women report non-use or inconsistent use because of method dissatisfaction. The sexual acceptability of contraception-how birth control methods affect users' sexual well-being-is likely an important component of contraceptive satisfaction but has yet to be systematically examined.

objectiveThis study aimed to assess contraceptive satisfaction among new-start contraceptive users and examine whether sexual acceptability measures predict contraceptive satisfaction at 3 months while controlling for more commonly measured contraceptive side effects. STUDY

designThis analysis used data derived from the baseline, 1-month, and 3-month surveys of the HER Salt Lake Contraceptive Initiative, a prospective cohort study of new contraceptive clients. From March 2016 to March 2017, enrolled participants received their desired contraceptive method at no cost and could switch or discontinue at any time (up to 3 years). This analysis included individuals who continued their new contraceptive method for at least 1 month and completed all relevant survey measures. We used ordered logistic regression modeling to predict contraceptive satisfaction at 3 months. Primary predictor variables included changes in sexual functioning (6-item Female Sexual Function Index), sexual satisfaction (New Sexual Satisfaction Scale), and perceived impact of the contraceptive method on sex life at 1 month. Covariates included vaginal bleeding changes, physical side effects, and mood-related side effects.

resultsOur analytical sample included 1879 individuals. At 3 months, 52.1% of participants were "completely satisfied" with their contraceptive method, 30.7% were "somewhat satisfied," 4.2% were "neither satisfied nor dissatisfied," 6.9% were "somewhat dissatisfied," and 6.2% were "completely dissatisfied." Compared with patients who said their contraceptive method made their sex life "a lot" worse at 1 month, patients whose method improved their sex life "a lot" had a 7.7 times increased odds of greater satisfaction at 3 months (95% confidence interval, 4.02-14.60; P<.0001) and patients whose method improved their sex life a "little" had a 5.88 times increased odds of greater satisfaction (confidence interval, 3.12-11.11; P<.001). To a much lesser degree, experiencing less or no bleeding was significantly associated with increased satisfaction, whereas worsening of physical side effects was linked to decreased satisfaction. The only other factors significantly associated with satisfaction were changes in bleeding and physical side effects.

conclusionOur findings suggest that patients' sexual experiences of their contraceptive methods are important correlates of satisfaction. Clinicians may wish to underscore that sexual experiences of birth control methods matter and encourage patients to find a contraceptive method that works for them sexually.

Indexed as

Contraceptive AgentsPersonal SatisfactionContraceptionContraceptive DevicesFemaleHumansPregnancyProspective StudiesContraceptive Agentsbirth controlbleedingcontraceptionsatisfactionsexual acceptabilityside effects

Identifiers

PMID34656551
PMCPMC8916969
OpenAlexW3206133295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.