Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34656379›Full record

ArticleVaccine2021

Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of BNT162b2 booster in BBIBP-CorV-vaccinated individuals compared with homologous BNT162b2 vaccination: Results of a pilot prospective cohort study from Lebanon.

Rima Moghnieh, Rana Mekdashi, Salam El-Hassan, Dania Abdallah, Tamima Jisr, Mohammad Bader, Ihab Jizi, Mohamed H Sayegh, Abdul Rahman Bizri

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Rima MoghniehMakassed General Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon; Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon. Electronic address: moghniehrima@gmail.com.
Rana MekdashiMakassed General Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon.
Salam El-HassanMakassed General Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon.
Dania AbdallahMakassed General Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon.
Tamima JisrMakassed General Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon.
Mohammad BaderMakassed General Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon.
Ihab JiziAl-Zahraa University Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon.
Mohamed H SayeghSenior Scientific Advisor, GAP Solutions (under Contract No. 75N93019D00026 with National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services, United States of America); American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Abdul Rahman BizriAmerican University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
Makassed General Hospital · LBAmerican University of Beirut · LBLebanese University · LBNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS 75N93019D00026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Facing new COVID-19 waves, the effectiveness of BBIBP-CorV has been noted to be low in countries whose populations were already administered two doses of the vaccine. Heterologous vaccination using ChAdOx1-S/BNT162b2 elicited higher immunogenicity compared with homologous immunization. BBIBP-CorV/BNT162b2 combination is worth testing. In this pilot prospective cohort study conducted at Makassed General Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon, from February 17, 2021, to June 30, 2021, we tested the safety and immunogenicity of a BNT162b2 booster dose in COVID-19-naïve individuals who had received two doses of the BBIBP-CorV vaccine. Heterologous booster vaccination was found to be safe and well tolerated. It was significantly associated with higher anti-spike IgG geometric mean titers compared to that after homologous BNT162b2 immunization in COVID-19-naïve individuals [(8040BAU/mL, 95%confidence interval (CI), 4612-14016) vs (1384BAU/mL, 95%CI, 1063-1801), respectively, (P < 0.0001)]. In countries with limited access to mRNA vaccines and where populations have already received BBIBP-CorV, mixing BBIBP-CorV/BNT162b2 is seen to overcome the low immunogenicity induced by BBIBP-CorV alone, thus potentially providing protection against emerging variants.

Indexed as

COVID-19BNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineLebanonProspective StudiesSARS-CoV-2VaccinationBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 VaccinesBBIBP-CorVBNT162b2COVID-19Heterologous immunizationHomologous immunizationLebanon

Identifiers

PMID34656379
PMCPMC8513356
OpenAlexW3207354788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.