ArticleThe American journal of cardiology2021
Secular Trends in Cardiovascular Health in US Adults (from NHANES 2007 to 2018).
Article in The American journal of cardiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Cardiovascular disease mortality trends in young adults aged 18-34 years, United States, 2000-2023.Annals of epidemiology · 2025Article
- An Age-Period-Cohort Analysis of Cardiovascular Disease Mortality in the United States from 1999 to 2018.The American journal of medicine · 2024Article
- Atherosclerosis and the Bidirectional Relationship between Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease: From Bench to Bedside-Part 1.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Developing a national surveillance system for stroke and acute myocardial infarction using claims data in the Republic of Korea: a retrospective study.Osong public health and research perspectives · 2024Article
- Using the New "Life's Essential 8" Metrics to Evaluate Trends in Cardiovascular Health Among US Adults From 2005 to 2018: Analysis of Serial Cross-sectional Studies.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2023Article
- Racial disparities and prevalence of cardiovascular disease risk factors, cardiometabolic risk factors, and cardiovascular health metrics among US adults: NHANES 2011-2018.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Cardiorespiratory Fitness in the Prevention and Management of Cardiovascular Disease.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Article
- Black-white Differences in Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Rates Among Young Adults with Ischemic Stroke.Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2022Article
- The trend of 10-year cardiovascular risk among diabetic and non-diabetic participants in Tehran Lipid and glucose study: 1999-2018.BMC public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deceleration in the decline of cardiovascular disease mortality has been observed recently in the US. We aimed to examine the recent secular trends of cardiovascular health metrics in the US general population. A total of 32,832 adults aged ≥20 years from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 2007 to 2018 were included in this analysis. Cardiovascular health included 7 health metrics: smoking status, body mass index, physical activity, healthy diet score, total cholesterol, blood pressure, and fasting plasma glucose. Age-standardized mean of overall cardiovascular health score did not significantly change during 2007 to 2010, 2011 to 2014, and 2015 to 2018 in the US adult population (7.88, 8.03, and 7.91, respectively, P-trend = 0.85). The age-standardized proportions of ideal smoking status (P-trend = 0.003), ideal physical activity (P-trend = 0.03), and untreated total cholesterol <200 mg/dL (P-trend <0.001) were significantly increased but the proportions of body mass index <25.0 kg/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.