ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2021
The impact of cross-docked poses on performance of machine learning classifier for protein-ligand binding pose prediction.
Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Comparative Study of Deep Learning and Classical Modeling Approaches for Protein-Ligand Binding Pose and Affinity Prediction in Coronavirus Main Proteases.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- The future of pharmaceuticals: Artificial intelligence in drug discovery and development.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2025Review
- Can Deep Learning Blind Docking Methods be Used to Predict Allosteric Compounds?Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- Robustly interrogating machine learning-based scoring functions: what are they learning?Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- ComprehensiveCurrent computer-aided drug design · 2025Article
- Benchmarking Cross-Docking Strategies in Kinase Drug Discovery.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2024Article
- Application of Virtual Drug Study to New Drug Research and Development: Challenges and Opportunity.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2024Review
- A new paradigm for applying deep learning to protein-ligand interaction prediction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Targeting JMJD1C to selectively disrupt tumor TNature immunology · 2024Article
- CarsiDock: a deep learning paradigm for accurate protein-ligand docking and screening based on large-scale pre-training.Chemical science · 2024Article
- Benchmarking Cross-Docking Strategies for Structure-Informed Machine Learning in Kinase Drug Discovery.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- A generalized protein-ligand scoring framework with balanced scoring, docking, ranking and screening powers.Chemical science · 2023Article
- TB-IECS: an accurate machine learning-based scoring function for virtual screening.Journal of cheminformatics · 2023Article
- Scoring Functions for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity Prediction using Structure-Based Deep Learning: A Review.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Structure-based drug design depends on the detailed knowledge of the three-dimensional (3D) structures of protein-ligand binding complexes, but accurate prediction of ligand-binding poses is still a major challenge for molecular docking due to deficiency of scoring functions (SFs) and ignorance of protein flexibility upon ligand binding. In this study, based on a cross-docking dataset dedicatedly constructed from the PDBbind database, we developed several XGBoost-trained classifiers to discriminate the near-native binding poses from decoys, and systematically assessed their performance with/without the involvement of the cross-docked poses in the training/test sets. The calculation results illustrate that using Extended Connectivity Interaction Features (ECIF), Vina energy terms and docking pose ranks as the features can achieve the best performance, according to the validation through the random splitting or refined-core splitting and the testing on the re-docked or cross-docked poses. Besides, it is found that, despite the significant decrease of the performance for the threefold clustered cross-validation, the inclusion of the Vina energy terms can effectively ensure the lower limit of the performance of the models and thus improve their generalization capability. Furthermore, our calculation results also highlight the importance of the incorporation of the cross-docked poses into the training of the SFs with wide application domain and high robustness for binding pose prediction. The source code and the newly-developed cross-docking datasets can be freely available at https://github.com/sc8668/ml_pose_prediction and https://zenodo.org/record/5525936 , respectively, under an open-source license. We believe that our study may provide valuable guidance for the development and assessment of new machine learning-based SFs (MLSFs) for the predictions of protein-ligand binding poses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.