Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34656129›Full record

ArticleAIDS research and therapy2021

Acquired HIV drug resistance and virologic monitoring in a HIV hyper-endemic setting in KwaZulu-Natal Province, South Africa.

Benjamin Chimukangara, Richard J Lessells, Lavanya Singh, Indra Grigalionyte, Nonhlanhla Yende-Zuma, Rochelle Adams, Halima Dawood, Linda Dlamini, Sibonisile Buthelezi, Sheldon Chetty and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS research and therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Benjamin ChimukangaraCentre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa. Benjamin.Chimukangara@caprisa.org.
Richard J LessellsKwaZulu-Natal Research and Innovation Platform (KRISP), College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Doris Duke Medical Research Institute, Durban, South Africa.
Lavanya SinghKwaZulu-Natal Research and Innovation Platform (KRISP), College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Doris Duke Medical Research Institute, Durban, South Africa.
Indra GrigalionyteCentre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Nonhlanhla Yende-ZumaCentre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Rochelle AdamsCentre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Halima DawoodCentre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Linda DlaminiNational Department of Health, Pretoria, South Africa.
Sibonisile ButheleziEast Boom Community Health Centre, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
Sheldon ChettyEast Boom Community Health Centre, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.
Karidia DialloDivision of Global HIV and Tuberculosis, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Pretoria, South Africa.
Wayne A DuffusDivision of Global HIV and Tuberculosis, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Pretoria, South Africa.
Mary MogashoaDivision of Global HIV and Tuberculosis, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Pretoria, South Africa.
Melissa B HagenDivision of Global HIV and Tuberculosis, Center for Global Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Pretoria, South Africa.
Jennifer GiandhariKwaZulu-Natal Research and Innovation Platform (KRISP), College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Doris Duke Medical Research Institute, Durban, South Africa.
Tulio de OliveiraCentre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Pravi MoodleyDepartment of Virology, School of Laboratory Medicine and Medical Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal and National Health Laboratory Service, Durban, South Africa.
Nesri PadayatchiCentre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Kogieleum NaidooCentre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA), University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.

Funding

CDC HHS GH001142PEPFAR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntroduction of tenofovir (TDF) plus lamivudine (3TC) and dolutegravir (DTG) in first- and second-line HIV treatment regimens in South Africa warrants characterization of acquired HIV-1 drug resistance (ADR) mutations that could impact DTG-based antiretroviral therapy (ART). In this study, we sought to determine prevalence of ADR mutations and their potential impact on susceptibility to drugs used in combination with DTG among HIV-positive adults (≥ 18 years) accessing routine care at a selected ART facility in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

methodsWe enrolled adult participants in a cross-sectional study between May and September 2019. Eligible participants had a most recent documented viral load (VL) ≥ 1000 copies/mL after at least 6 months on ART. We genotyped HIV-1 reverse transcriptase and protease genes by Sanger sequencing and assessed ADR. We characterized the effect of ADR mutations on the predicted susceptibility to drugs used in combination with DTG.

resultsFrom 143 participants enrolled, we obtained sequence data for 115 (80%), and 92.2% (95% CI 85.7-96.4) had ADR. The proportion with ADR was similar for participants on first-line ART (65/70, 92.9%, 95% CI 84.1-97.6) and those on second-line ART (40/44, 90.9%, 95% CI 78.3-97.5), and was present for the single participant on third-line ART. Approximately 89% (62/70) of those on first-line ART had dual class NRTI and NNRTI resistance and only six (13.6%) of those on second-line ART had major PI mutations. Most participants (82%) with first-line viraemia maintained susceptibility to Zidovudine (AZT), and the majority of them had lost susceptibility to TDF (71%) and 3TC (84%). Approximately two in every five TDF-treated individuals had thymidine analogue mutations (TAMs).

conclusionsSusceptibility to AZT among most participants with first-line viraemia suggests that a new second-line regimen of AZT + 3TC + DTG could be effective. However, atypical occurrence of TAMs in TDF-treated individuals suggests a less effective AZT + 3TC + DTG regimen in a subpopulation of patients. As most patients with first-line viraemia had at least low-level resistance to TDF and 3TC, identifying viraemia before switch to TDF + 3TC + DTG is important to avoid DTG functional monotherapy. These findings highlight a need for close monitoring of outcomes on new standardized treatment regimens.

Indexed as

Anti-HIV AgentsHIV InfectionsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDrug ResistanceDrug Resistance, ViralHumansLamivudineSouth AfricaAnti-HIV AgentsLamivudineAcquired drug resistanceAntiretroviral treatmentHIV-1KwaZulu-NatalViraemia

Identifiers

PMID34656129
PMCPMC8520607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.