Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34656119›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2021

Comparison of ticagrelor with clopidogrel on quality of life in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Hyeyeon Moon, Yoon-Sung Jo, Soo-Jin Kim, Sua Jo, Kyungil Park

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02618733 (A Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Comparing ticagreLor Versus clopidogrEl on mIcrocirculation in Patients With Acute cOronary Syndrome Study), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02618733 nacompletednot on this map

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Comparing ticagreLor Versus clopidogrEl on mIcrocirculation in Patients With Acute cOronary Syndrome Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorDong-A UniversityRan2014 to 2016Enrolled120ConditionsAcute Coronary SyndromeArmsTicagrelor, Clopidogrel
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hyeyeon Moon *Regional Cardiovascular Center, Dong-A University Hospital, Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Daesingongwon 26, Seo-gu, Busan, 49201, Republic of Korea.
Yoon-Sung Jo *Regional Cardiovascular Center, Dong-A University Hospital, Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Daesingongwon 26, Seo-gu, Busan, 49201, Republic of Korea.
Soo-Jin KimRegional Cardiovascular Center, Dong-A University Hospital, Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Daesingongwon 26, Seo-gu, Busan, 49201, Republic of Korea.
Sua JoRegional Cardiovascular Center, Dong-A University Hospital, Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Daesingongwon 26, Seo-gu, Busan, 49201, Republic of Korea.
Kyungil ParkRegional Cardiovascular Center, Dong-A University Hospital, Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Daesingongwon 26, Seo-gu, Busan, 49201, Republic of Korea. cardiopark@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5212-2128

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTicagrelor has a Class I recommendation for use following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). However, ticagrelor needs to be taken twice a day, as compared to clopidogrel. Its adverse effects, such as dyspnea or bleeding, are known to be more common than with clopidogrel. Dyspnea may tend to be uncomfortable and limit activity. Major bleeding often leads to hospitalization or transfusions, and frequent minor bleeding, which might not result in patients seeking medical care, can make ACS patients feel unhealthy. Thus, these characteristics may affect the health-related quality of life (HQOL).

methodsIn the PLEIO (comParison of ticagreLor and clopidogrEl on mIcrocirculation in patients with acute cOronary syndrome) trial, we randomized 120 participants to receive ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily or clopidogrel 75 mg once daily for at least 12 months. We carried out an HQOL assessment with the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire on the day of discharge following PCI, as well as six months later.

resultsAt discharge, the HQOL measures were similar in the ticagrelor and clopidogrel groups, both having a physical component summary (PCS) and a mental component summary (MCS) score. A six-month HQOL follow-up assessment showed that there were no differences between the two study groups in either the PCS or the MCS scores. In both groups, the PCS scores significantly increased over six months of treatment (both p < 0.01). However, the MCS score did not differ significantly. A baseline MCS score is an independent predictor of better physical and mental health status at six months.

conclusionsTicagrelor, as compared to clopidogrel, did not significantly reduce the HQOL during the six months following PCI in patients with ACS. Clinical Trial Registration URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02618733.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromePercutaneous Coronary InterventionClopidogrelHumansPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsQuality of LifeTicagrelorTreatment OutcomeClopidogrelPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsTicagrelorAcute coronary syndromeClopidogrelHealth-related quality of lifeTicagrelor

Identifiers

PMID34656119
PMCPMC8520288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.